Szakmai felelősség

Professional Responsibility

Az ABA modellszabályai és a kaliforniai szakmai magatartási szabályok: konfliktusok, titoktartás, díjak, kompetencia és őszinteség. Szinte minden kaliforniai esszénapon tesztelve.

1 fejezet1 óra olvasás15 gyakorlati kérdések

Olvassa el a 1 fejezetet ingyenesen Gyakorlati esszék

Fejezetek

1Sources, Discipline and Forming the RelationshipThe foundation of Professional Responsibility for the California essay: the ABA Model Rules, the California Rules of Professional Conduct and the State Bar Act; how the State Bar disciplines lawyers and how discipline differs from malpractice; when a lawyer-client relationship forms and what a lawyer owes a prospective client; who decides what in a representation, limited-scope work and advice about illegal conduct, including California’s cannabis comment; the statutory duties in B&P § 6068, including the 30-day self-report; and the ABA-then-California method for every PR essay.56 minIngyenes

Miben különbözik Kalifornia

1. fejezetből

CAKaliforniai megkülönböztetés

Prospective clients: ABA versus California

Általános szabály (szövetségi / többségi)

MR 1.18(c) disqualifies the lawyer only if the information could be significantly harmful to the prospective client. Both persons must give informed consent, confirmed in writing.

Kalifornia

CRPC 1.18(c) disqualifies the lawyer if the information is confidential under B&P § 6068(e) and rule 1.6 and is material to the matter. Both persons must give informed written consent.

“Material” is a lower bar than “significantly harmful”, so California disqualifies more often. Apply both tests.

CAKaliforniai megkülönböztetés

Illegal conduct and the cannabis comment

Általános szabály (szövetségi / többségi)

MR 1.2(d) bars counseling or assisting conduct the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. It has no special provision for a conflict between state and federal law.

Kalifornia

CRPC 1.2.1 also bars conduct the lawyer knows violates any law, rule or ruling of a tribunal. Its comment addresses California law that conflicts with federal law, such as state-licensed cannabis. The lawyer may advise on and help with compliance, but must also explain the federal law.

For a cannabis client, write: permitted under CRPC 1.2.1 and its comment, if the lawyer advises about federal law. Under MR 1.2(d) alone, note the risk: the conduct is a federal crime, and the ABA text has no exception.

CAKaliforniai megkülönböztetés

Exceptions to confidentiality

Általános szabály (szövetségi / többségi)

MR 1.6(b) lists several permissive exceptions. The lawyer may disclose to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm. The lawyer may also disclose to prevent or remedy some client crimes or frauds that use the lawyer’s services, to get ethics advice, or for self-defense.

Kalifornia

Apart from client consent, B&P § 6068(e)(2) and CRPC 1.6(b) allow disclosure only to prevent a criminal act likely to cause death or substantial bodily harm. Before disclosing, if reasonable, the lawyer must try to dissuade the client and tell the client of the decision to disclose (CRPC 1.6(c)).

California has no financial-fraud exception. If a client’s fraud will cost a victim money, the ABA lawyer may sometimes disclose; the California lawyer may not. Chapter 3 covers the details.

Leckék

Robert Castellano

Szakmai felelősség előadó

Former State Bar ethics counsel; discipline-defense practice; legal-ethics adjunct.

Előadóink mesterséges intelligenciával rendelkező oktatók; a portrék illusztrációk.

Az Szakmai felelősség videóleckék rögzítése folyamatban van.

Mind a 13 alany 249 $-tól havonta

Korlátlan számú MBE és kaliforniai kérdések, időzített sorozatok és gúnyok, mesterséges intelligencia-esszé visszajelzés, minden fejezet kiadásakor és a vizsga dátuma köré épülő tanulmányi terv.

Lásd a terveket