Solusi · Bab 1

Solusi · Bab 1 dari 1

Foundations and the Remedies Attack Order

62 mntbagian 7Bab gratis

The vocabulary and the fixed order of analysis behind every Remedies essay: legal versus equitable remedies and why the difference matters, the four families of remedies (compensatory, restitutionary, coercive, declaratory), the three limits on damages and mitigation, the prerequisites and defenses for equitable relief, and the six-step attack order applied to a crossover fact pattern.

Tujuan pembelajaran

  1. 1.Distinguish legal from equitable remedies and explain why the difference decides the jury right, the judge’s discretion and enforcement by contempt.
  2. 2.Classify any remedy as compensatory, restitutionary, coercive or declaratory and choose the measure that gives the client the most.
  3. 3.State the three limits on damages (causation, foreseeability, certainty) and the mitigation rule, including the California collateral-source rule for medical expenses.
  4. 4.List the prerequisites for equitable relief and the five equitable defenses, and write the “court is likely to” conclusion.
  5. 5.Apply the six-step Remedies attack order to a crossover fact pattern and write a remedy paragraph in IRAC form.

1.1 How Remedies is tested

Remedies is the law of what a court can do for a winning party. It answers one question: the plaintiff has proved a wrong, so what does the plaintiff get? Remedies is an essay-only subject. Every Remedies question rests on a wrong from another subject: a breach of contract, a tort, a property injury or a breach of fiduciary duty. Sometimes the question is labeled a crossover (Contracts/Remedies, February 2025). Sometimes it stands alone (July 2024, July 2026). The call then asks, for example, what remedies Ana can obtain.

Because every Remedies question rests on another subject’s wrong, you cannot study Remedies in isolation. The wrong (breach of contract, conversion, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty) decides which measures of relief are open. Learn the substantive subject first, then apply the fixed order of analysis in this chapter. Graders reward a candidate who separates the wrong from the remedy and gives each remedy its own heading.

Remedies at a glance
ItemDetail
MBE weightNot an MBE subject. Contract remedies appear inside MBE Contracts questions; injunction standards appear inside MBE Civil Procedure questions.
Essay frequency38 of the last 50 California exams (76 percent), and 7 of the 12 most recent exams, including July 2026.
California lawLow. Answer under general legal principles unless the call names California law; California statutes are useful support, not a requirement.
NextGen exam (July 2028 and later)Not a separate subject. Contract and tort remedies are folded into Contracts and Torts.
Typical formOne essay, labeled Remedies or a crossover: one hour, three or four remedies, each analyzed under its own heading.

Catatan

The default-law sentence on the essay booklet

The essay instructions print a default-law rule. It says: “Unless a question expressly asks you to use California law, you should answer according to legal theories and principles of general application”. For Remedies this means: state the general rule first. Add a California statute or case only when it supports the same rule or when the call names California.

Timing matters. Each essay has one hour. Plan about 10 minutes to read and outline, 45 minutes to write and 5 minutes to check. A Remedies question usually raises three or four remedies, so give each remedy about 12 minutes. A short, complete paragraph on every remedy scores more than a long paragraph on one.

remedy – The relief a court gives to a person whose legal right has been violated. It may be money, the return of property, an order to act or stop, or a declaration of rights.

StatutaCA

Cal. Civ. Code § 3274

Civ. Code § 3274 (remedies defined)

Paraphrase: As a general rule, compensation (money damages) is the remedy California law provides for the violation of private rights. Specific relief (such as specific performance) and preventive relief (injunctions) are available only in the cases the Civil Code lists.
Sumber terbuka
The most-tested Remedies rules (SmartBarPrep, last 50 exams)
RuleExams of 50Where in this book
Specific performanceExams of 5016Where in this bookChapter 6
Contract legal remedies (all measures)Exams of 5015Where in this bookChapter 2
Expectation damagesExams of 5014Where in this bookChapter 2
MitigationExams of 5013Where in this bookChapter 2; previewed in section 4 below
LachesExams of 5012Where in this bookChapter 7; previewed in section 5 below
Unclean handsExams of 5011Where in this bookChapter 7; previewed in section 5 below
RescissionExams of 508Where in this bookChapter 6
Preliminary injunctionExams of 507Where in this bookChapter 5

Elemen

The Remedies attack order (taught fully in section 6)

Answer every Remedies call in this order:

  1. 1.1 Wrong: Name the substantive wrong: breach of contract, tort, property injury or breach of fiduciary duty.
  2. 2.2 Damages: Legal damages: the measure, the three limits and mitigation.
  3. 3.3 Restitution: Legal restitution (quasi-contract), then equitable restitution (constructive trust, equitable lien, tracing).
  4. 4.4 Coercive relief: Specific performance or injunction: elements, adequacy, feasibility, hardship.
  5. 5.5 Equitable defenses: Laches, unclean hands, estoppel, unconscionability, impossibility.
  6. 6.6 Declaratory relief: Add it when the parties need their rights declared and no other remedy fits.

Semua elemen diperlukan.

Poin penting

A call that asks “What remedies are available?” is an instruction to walk the whole order. Do not stop at damages.

Kiat ujian

Give every remedy its own heading and end each with a one-sentence conclusion. Graders read headings first; a missing heading usually means a missing point. Remedies appeared on 38 of the last 50 exams.

Catatan penting

  1. 1.Remedies is essay-only and always built on a Contracts, Torts, Property or Business Associations wrong.
  2. 2.Default law is general principles; cite California only for support or when the call names it.
  3. 3.The hot rules: specific performance, contract damages, mitigation, laches, unclean hands.
  4. 4.Use the six-step attack order for every call that asks about remedies.

English law once had two court systems. The common-law courts gave money and the return of property; the Court of Chancery gave orders when money was not enough. California and the federal courts merged the two systems long ago, but the rules stay separate. The split still decides three things: whether a jury decides the facts, whether the judge may refuse relief, and whether the defendant can be jailed for disobeying.

legal remedy – A remedy the common-law courts gave: money damages, or the return of specific property through replevin (goods) or ejectment (land). Either party may demand a jury on a legal claim.

equitable remedy – A court order directed to the defendant personally (injunction, specific performance) or an equitable device that reaches property (constructive trust, equitable lien). The judge decides, in discretion.

Legal versus equitable remedies
FeatureLegal remediesEquitable remedies
ExamplesLegal remediesCompensatory damages, nominal and punitive damages, legal restitution (quasi-contract), replevin, ejectmentEquitable remediesInjunction, specific performance, constructive trust, equitable lien, rescission, reformation
Who decidesLegal remediesJury, if a party demands oneEquitable remediesJudge
ThresholdLegal remediesA wrong plus proof of loss or gainEquitable remediesA wrong plus an inadequate legal remedy
DiscretionLegal remediesNone: proved damages must be awardedEquitable remediesYes: the court balances hardships and may refuse relief
EnforcementLegal remediesMoney judgment; execution against the defendant’s propertyEquitable remediesContempt (fine or jail) for disobeying the order
Defenses unique to the remedyLegal remediesNone; only the substantive defensesEquitable remediesLaches, unclean hands, estoppel, unconscionability, impossibility

Aturan

Equity acts only where the legal remedy is inadequate

A court grants an equitable remedy only if damages would not adequately protect the plaintiff. Damages are inadequate when the loss cannot be measured in money, the defendant cannot pay, the property is unique, or the wrong will keep repeating.

irreparable harm – Harm that money cannot repair after it happens, such as loss of unique property, disclosure of a secret or lasting injury to health. Required for an injunction.

Elemen

When damages are inadequate

Any one of these is enough to write the adequacy sentence:

  1. 1.Multiplicity: The wrong repeats or continues, so the plaintiff would need many suits (a recurring trespass, for example).
  2. 2.Unique property: The subject is land, art, an heirloom or a one-of-a-kind good; money cannot buy a substitute.
  3. 3.Speculative loss: The loss is real but cannot be measured with reasonable certainty (lost goodwill, a new business).
  4. 4.Insolvent defendant: A money judgment would not be collectible.
  5. 5.Cannot be undone: The injury cannot be repaired after the fact: a felled tree, a disclosed trade secret, lasting harm to health.

Satu saja sudah cukup.

Mnemonik

MUSIC

  • M– Multiplicity of suits
  • U– Unique property
  • S– Speculative or unmeasurable loss
  • I– Insolvent defendant
  • C– Cannot be undone (**irreparable harm**)

Any one reason makes the legal remedy inadequate. Name the reason that fits the facts; do not list all five.

StatutaCA

Cal. Civ. Code § 3387

Civ. Code § 3387 (land presumed unique)

It is to be presumed that the breach of an agreement to transfer real property cannot be adequately relieved by pecuniary compensation. In the case of a single-family dwelling which the party seeking performance intends to occupy, this presumption is conclusive. In all other cases, this presumption is a presumption affecting the burden of proof.
Sumber terbuka

Aturan

Unique goods and land

Under the UCC, a buyer may obtain specific performance when the goods are unique or in other proper circumstances. One such circumstance is that no substitute can be found in the market. Land is unique by presumption, so a buyer of land normally satisfies the adequacy element without more.

In an essay, the adequacy sentence is the gate to every equitable remedy. Write it early and tie it to one fact, for example that damages are inadequate because the parcel is unique. For land, Cal. Civ. Code § 3387 supplies the presumption. The presumption is conclusive for a single-family home the buyer intends to occupy. For goods, use UCC § 2-716. For a tort, point to the repeating or irreparable nature of the harm.

Contoh

Unique painting

A collector contracts to buy a specific painting by a living artist for $80,000. Before delivery, the seller receives a higher offer and refuses to deliver. The collector still wants the painting.

Analisa

Damages would give the collector the difference between market value and the price, but that money cannot buy this painting. The painting is unique, so the legal remedy is inadequate and the court may order specific performance.

Hasil

The collector is likely to obtain specific performance under UCC § 2-716, conditioned on paying the $80,000 price.

The jury-trial consequence

In federal court the Seventh Amendment preserves the right to a jury in “suits at common law,” meaning legal claims. Equitable claims are tried by the judge. Suppose one lawsuit joins a damages claim and an injunction claim that share a factual issue. The jury must decide that issue first (Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 (1959)). The judge then decides the equitable claim without contradicting the verdict.

Kasus

Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 (1959) (U.S. Supreme Court 1959)

Fakta

A theater operator sued a competitor for a declaration that its exclusive film contracts were lawful and for an injunction. The competitor counterclaimed for antitrust damages, a legal claim, and demanded a jury. The district court planned to try the equitable claims first, without a jury.

Memegang

When legal and equitable claims share issues, the legal claims must be tried to the jury first. A judge may not decide the shared issues in the equitable claim and so bind the jury.

Mengapa itu penting

The jury right attaches to the claim, not to the lawsuit. Adding an equitable claim does not remove the jury from the legal claim. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469 (1962) extended the rule to a money claim labeled as an equitable accounting.

Catatan

California state court: order of trial

The Seventh Amendment does not apply in state court. The California Constitution (art. I, § 16) keeps the jury right as it existed at common law. The court looks at the “gist of the action” (C & K Engineering Contractors v. Amber Steel Co. (1978) 23 Cal.3d 1). A legal gist goes to a jury; an equitable gist goes to the judge, who may try the equitable issues first. Write this only if a California-law call includes a jury demand.

Poin penting

The jury right follows the claim. Damages: jury. Injunction or specific performance: judge. Both in one case: legal issues first (federal), gist of the action (California).

Kiat ujian

Write the adequacy sentence before every equitable remedy and tie it to one fact: unique land, insolvent defendant, repeated trespass. Specific performance appeared on 16 of the last 50 exams, and the adequacy point is where its marks begin.

Catatan penting

  1. 1.Legal remedies: money and return of property; jury; no discretion; enforced by execution.
  2. 2.Equitable remedies: orders and property devices; judge; discretion; enforced by contempt.
  3. 3.Gate to equity: the legal remedy is inadequate (MUSIC: multiplicity, unique, speculative, insolvent, cannot be undone).
  4. 4.Land is presumed unique (Civ. Code § 3387); unique goods qualify under UCC § 2-716.
  5. 5.Federal court: the jury decides shared issues first (Beacon Theatres); California: gist of the action.

1.3 Classification: compensatory, restitutionary, coercive and declaratory

Every remedy belongs to one of four families. Two questions sort them. First, whose number do we measure: the plaintiff’s loss or the defendant’s gain? Second, what does the court do: award money, give property back, order conduct, or declare rights? Naming the family in your first sentence tells the grader that you know what you are asking for.

compensatory remedy – Money measured by the plaintiff’s loss. Its purpose is to put the plaintiff in the position the plaintiff would have occupied if the wrong had not happened.

unjust enrichment – A benefit the defendant received at the plaintiff’s expense that it would be unfair for the defendant to keep. It is the basis of every restitutionary remedy.

restitutionary remedy – Relief measured by the defendant’s gain, not the plaintiff’s loss. Legal restitution is a money judgment; equitable restitution attaches to specific property (constructive trust, equitable lien).

coercive remedy – A court order that commands the defendant to do something (specific performance, mandatory injunction) or to stop doing something (prohibitory injunction). Disobedience is contempt of court.

declaratory remedy – A binding judgment that states the parties’ legal rights without ordering anyone to pay or act. Used to settle a dispute before anyone breaches.

StatutaCA

Cal. Civ. Code § 3281

Civ. Code § 3281 (damages defined)

Every person who suffers detriment from the unlawful act or omission of another, may recover from the person in fault a compensation therefor in money, which is called damages.
Sumber terbuka

Section 3282 defines detriment as “a loss or harm suffered in person or property” and so completes the picture. Together the two sections define the compensatory remedy: a loss, measured in money, paid by the person at fault. Two other money awards sit beside it. Nominal damages mark a wrong that caused no loss (Cal. Civ. Code § 3360). Punitive damages punish oppression, fraud or malice in tort, proved by clear and convincing evidence (Cal. Civ. Code § 3294). Chapter 3 covers both.

Compensation also has a ceiling. In contract, damages may not leave the plaintiff better off than full performance would have. Section 3358 states the cap:

StatutaCA

Cal. Civ. Code § 3358

Civ. Code § 3358 (no more than full performance)

Except as expressly provided by statute, no person can recover a greater amount in damages for the breach of an obligation, than he could have gained by the full performance thereof on both sides.
Sumber terbuka

Aturan

Restitution: the defendant must give back what was unjustly gained

A person who is unjustly enriched at the expense of another must restore the benefit. The measure is the defendant’s gain, not the plaintiff’s loss.

Aturan

Involuntary trustee (California)

One who gains a thing by fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence, breach of trust or other wrongful act holds it as an involuntary trustee. The trust benefits the person who would otherwise have had the thing. Exception: the holder is not a trustee if the holder has a better right to the thing.

The four families of remedies
FamilyWhat is measuredExamplesLegal or equitable
CompensatoryWhat is measuredThe plaintiff’s lossExamplesExpectation damages for breach; tort damages for injuryLegal or equitableLegal
RestitutionaryWhat is measuredThe defendant’s gainExamplesQuasi-contract (money); constructive trust, equitable lien, rescission with restorationLegal or equitableLegal (money) or equitable (property)
CoerciveWhat is measuredNothing; the order itself is the reliefExamplesInjunction; specific performanceLegal or equitableEquitable
DeclaratoryWhat is measuredNothing; rights are declaredExamplesA declaration that a contract is void, or that a boundary lies in a certain placeLegal or equitableFollows the nature of the underlying dispute

The plaintiff often has a choice between families. A defendant who took and sold the plaintiff’s property is liable for the plaintiff’s loss (compensatory) or for the sale proceeds (a restitutionary remedy based on unjust enrichment). The plaintiff may not have both for the same wrong, because that would be a double recovery. In an essay, compute both numbers, then state which one the plaintiff should elect and why.

election of remedies – The plaintiff’s choice between inconsistent remedies for one wrong, such as damages or restitution. The plaintiff may plead both but may recover only one.

Aturan

Choosing among remedies

The plaintiff may plead inconsistent remedies in the alternative but may not recover twice for one injury. Damages and restitution for the same wrong are alternatives; the plaintiff elects the larger. A coercive order may be combined with damages for past harm.

Contoh

Fraudulent purchase and resale

A dealer falsely tells an owner that her antique clock is a modern copy worth $300. The owner sells it to the dealer for $300. The clock is worth $5,000. The dealer resells it to a museum for $9,000.

Analisa

The owner’s loss is $4,700 (the $5,000 value less the $300 received). The dealer’s gain is $8,700 (the $9,000 received less the $300 paid). Both measures are available for fraud, but not both together. The owner should elect restitution of the dealer’s profit because it is larger.

Hasil

Restitution of $8,700 plus interest; or $4,700 in compensatory damages if the owner prefers; not both for the same loss.

Contoh

Order or declaration?

A neighbor builds a fence that a landowner believes crosses the boundary by two feet. The neighbor disputes the survey. The landowner wants the fence removed.

Analisa

A declaratory judgment settles where the boundary lies but moves no fence. A mandatory injunction orders removal; it is a coercive remedy and needs the inadequacy showing (land is unique, the trespass continues). Ask for both: declare the boundary, then order removal.

Hasil

A declaratory remedy plus a mandatory injunction; damages for the past trespass are a third, compensatory, claim.

Which remedies fit which wrong
WrongMoney remediesSpecific or equitable remedies
Breach of contractMoney remediesExpectation damages; reliance or restitution as alternatives; liquidated damages if validSpecific or equitable remediesSpecific performance (unique subject); rescission or reformation; constructive trust if fraud
Conversion or trespass to goodsMoney remediesValue at conversion plus interest, or the defendant’s sale proceeds (waiver of tort: suing for the defendant’s gain instead of the plaintiff’s loss)Specific or equitable remediesReplevin (legal); constructive trust on proceeds; injunction against repeated taking
Trespass to land or nuisanceMoney remediesDamages for past harm; diminished valueSpecific or equitable remediesInjunction against the continuing wrong; ejectment (legal) to recover possession
FraudMoney remediesOut-of-pocket loss (California, Civ. Code § 3343) or benefit of the bargain (many states); punitive damagesSpecific or equitable remediesRescission with restoration; constructive trust or equitable lien on what was obtained
Breach of fiduciary dutyMoney remediesDamages for the loss causedSpecific or equitable remediesDisgorgement of profits; constructive trust on property acquired; injunction

Poin penting

Compensatory looks at the plaintiff’s loss. Restitution looks at the defendant’s gain. Coercive relief looks forward and orders conduct. Declaratory relief only states rights.

Kiat ujian

When the defendant profited more than the plaintiff lost, write a separate paragraph headed “Restitution (unjust enrichment).” State both numbers and choose the larger. Restitution was tested on 7 of the last 50 exams.

Catatan penting

  1. 1.Four families: compensatory (plaintiff’s loss), restitutionary (defendant’s gain), coercive (order), declaratory (statement of rights).
  2. 2.Civ. Code § 3281: damages are money compensation for detriment caused by another’s unlawful act or omission.
  3. 3.Civ. Code § 3358 caps contract damages at what full performance would have given the plaintiff.
  4. 4.Civ. Code § 2224 makes a person an involuntary trustee of a thing gained by fraud, accident, mistake or other wrongful act.
  5. 5.Compute loss and gain, then elect the larger; never recover twice for the same loss.

1.4 The three limits on damages and mitigation

Damages are the default remedy, and every damages paragraph passes through the same three gates: causation, foreseeability and certainty. A fourth rule, mitigation, then subtracts losses the plaintiff could have avoided. Chapter 2 teaches the measures for each kind of wrong. This section previews the limits, which graders expect in every damages discussion, in contract and in tort.

StatutaCA

Cal. Civ. Code § 3300

Civ. Code § 3300 (contract damages)

For the breach of an obligation arising from contract, the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by this Code, is the amount which will compensate the party aggrieved for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, or which, in the ordinary course of things, would be likely to result therefrom.
Sumber terbuka

The tort measure, Cal. Civ. Code § 3333, uses almost the same words but ends differently. The plaintiff recovers for all detriment proximately caused “whether it could have been anticipated or not” by the defendant. That last phrase is the key difference between the two branches. In contract, unforeseeable losses are cut off. In tort, foreseeability is part of proximate cause, and a defendant pays the full harm even to an unusually fragile plaintiff.

Elemen

The limits on damages

Every damages claim must satisfy the first three; the fourth reduces the award:

  1. 1.Causation: The wrong was the actual (but-for) and proximate cause of the loss.
  2. 2.Foreseeability: In contract, the loss was foreseeable at the time of contracting (the Hadley rule).
  3. 3.Certainty: The amount can be estimated with reasonable certainty; speculation is not enough.
  4. 4.Mitigation: The plaintiff cannot recover losses that reasonable effort would have avoided.

Semua elemen diperlukan.

Aturan

Causation

The plaintiff must prove that the wrong was an actual (but-for) cause of the loss and that the loss was its proximate result. In contract, the loss must be one that the breach “proximately caused” or that would follow “in the ordinary course of things.”

Kasus

Hadley v. Baxendale, (1854) 9 Exch. 341 (Court of Exchequer 1854)

Fakta

A mill stopped because its crankshaft broke. The miller hired a carrier to deliver the shaft to the maker as a pattern for a new one. The carrier delayed delivery, and the mill stayed closed for extra days. The miller sued for the lost profits of those days.

Memegang

Damages for breach of contract are limited to two kinds of loss. The first arises naturally from the breach. The second is loss that both parties could reasonably have contemplated, when contracting, as the probable result of a breach.

Mengapa itu penting

The foreseeability limit for contract damages. Nobody told the carrier that the mill would stay closed until the new shaft arrived, so the lost profits were not recoverable. Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 351 states the modern rule.

consequential damages – Losses beyond the value of the promised performance that flow from the plaintiff’s special circumstances, such as lost profits. Recoverable in contract only if foreseeable at contracting.

Foreseeability in contract is judged when the contract is made, not when it is broken. A claim for consequential damages therefore needs a fact showing what the defendant knew at contracting: a stated deadline, a disclosed resale, a known purpose. If the facts give you that knowledge, say so and award the loss. If not, the loss does not satisfy the second branch of Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch. 341, so it is cut off.

Aturan

Certainty

Damages are recoverable only to the extent the evidence permits the amount to be estimated with reasonable certainty. Lost profits of an established business may be proved from its records. Profits of a new or untested business are often too speculative, though courts accept reliable expert evidence.

Certainty concerns the amount of loss, not the fact of loss. Once the plaintiff proves that some loss occurred, the court accepts a reasonable estimate and resolves doubts against the wrongdoer. The “new business rule” is therefore a caution, not a bar. The plaintiff must produce evidence such as comparable businesses, expert projections or a track record. Without that evidence the court awards reliance damages or nominal damages instead.

Aturan

Mitigation (avoidable consequences)

A plaintiff may not recover damages for loss that the plaintiff could have avoided without undue risk, burden or humiliation. Reasonable effort is enough, and the defendant must prove a failure to mitigate. After a repudiation, the plaintiff may not keep performing and add to the damages. Reasonable costs of mitigation are recoverable.

Contoh

The substitute role

A studio contracts with an actress for the lead in a musical to be filmed in Los Angeles. The studio cancels the film. It offers her instead the lead in a western in Australia, at the same pay but without her approval rights over director and script. She refuses and sues for the full fee.

Analisa

Mitigation requires only that the plaintiff accept comparable substitute employment. The western was different in kind and inferior in its terms, so refusing it was reasonable. The studio, which bore the burden, could not show a failure to mitigate.

Hasil

The actress recovers the full contract fee (Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 176).

Mitigation is not a true duty: no one can sue a plaintiff for failing to mitigate. It is a limit on recovery. In an essay, write one short paragraph on it every time you award damages, even when the facts show nothing to avoid. A sentence such as “the owner had no reasonable way to reduce the loss, so mitigation does not reduce the award” earns a point.

Aturan

Collateral source rule (general rule)

Payments the plaintiff receives from a source independent of the defendant, such as insurance or a gift, are not deducted from the damages the defendant owes. The wrongdoer does not benefit from the plaintiff’s foresight in buying insurance.

CAPerbedaan Kalifornia

Collateral source rule and medical expenses

Aturan umum (federal / mayoritas)

Many states follow the traditional rule (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 920A). The plaintiff recovers the full reasonable value of medical care even if an insurer paid for it, and even if the insurer paid a discounted amount.

Kalifornia

California keeps the rule but caps the measure. For past medical expenses the plaintiff recovers no more than the amount actually paid or owed by the plaintiff or the insurer. The amount billed but written off by the provider is not recoverable (Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541).

Write the traditional rule first. Add Howell only if the call names California law or the facts give both a billed amount and a paid amount.

Kasus

Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541 (California Supreme Court 2011)

Fakta

A driver injured in a collision was billed about $190,000 for medical care. Her insurer paid about $60,000 under negotiated rates, and the providers wrote off the rest.

Memegang

A personal-injury plaintiff may recover as past medical expenses no more than the amount actually paid or incurred. The written-off portion was never a loss to the plaintiff.

Mengapa itu penting

The collateral source rule still bars evidence that insurance paid, but the measure is capped at the paid amount.

Kiat ujian

Mitigation: always one paragraph, even when nothing could be avoided. It was tested on 13 of the last 50 exams.

Poin penting

Three gates (causation, foreseeability, certainty), then subtract what the plaintiff could reasonably have avoided. Contract foreseeability is tested at contracting; tort foreseeability lives in proximate cause.

Catatan penting

  1. 1.Causation: actual and proximate cause of the loss (Civ. Code §§ 3300, 3333).
  2. 2.Foreseeability: contract losses must have been foreseeable at contracting (Hadley; Rest. § 351); in tort, proximate cause does the work.
  3. 3.Certainty: the amount must be provable with reasonable certainty; new-business profits need real evidence (Sargon).
  4. 4.Mitigation: no recovery for avoidable loss; comparable substitutes only; the defendant bears the burden (Parker).
  5. 5.Collateral sources are not deducted; in California, past medical expenses are capped at the amount paid (Howell).

1.5 Equitable prerequisites and defenses

Equity is a system of orders. Before a court orders a defendant to act or to stop, it asks whether the order is necessary, workable and fair. Those questions become the prerequisites for every coercive remedy. After the plaintiff clears them, the defendant may raise defenses that exist only in equity. Chapters 5 to 7 develop each rule.

Elemen

Prerequisites for permanent equitable relief

The plaintiff must show all of these:

  1. 1.Inadequate legal remedy: Damages would not make the plaintiff whole (MUSIC, section 2).
  2. 2.Feasibility of enforcement: The court can supervise the order without continuous oversight and has power over the defendant.
  3. 3.Balance of hardships: The hardship to the defendant (and the public) is not greatly disproportionate to the benefit to the plaintiff.

Semua elemen diperlukan.

Elemen

Plus, depending on the remedy

  1. 1.For specific performance: A valid, definite contract; the plaintiff has performed or is ready to perform; conditions are satisfied.
  2. 2.For an injunction: A tort or other wrong that is continuing or threatened and causes irreparable harm.

Satu saja sudah cukup.

Aturan

Permanent injunction

A permanent injunction requires four showings: irreparable injury, an inadequate legal remedy, a balance of hardships favoring the plaintiff, and no harm to the public interest. The order must also be one the court can enforce without continuous supervision.

Aturan

Interim relief: temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction

Before trial the plaintiff must show likely success on the merits and likely irreparable harm. The balance of hardships must also favor the plaintiff (Winter calls it the balance of equities), and an injunction must be in the public interest. The plaintiff usually posts a bond.

Aturan

Preliminary injunction (California)

California courts weigh two related factors. The first is how likely the plaintiff is to prevail on the merits. The second is the interim harm each side is likely to suffer if the injunction is granted or denied. A stronger showing on one factor can offset a weaker showing on the other.

StatutaCA

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 525

CCP § 525 (injunction defined)

An injunction is a writ or order requiring a person to refrain from a particular act. It may be granted by the court in which the action is brought, or by a judge thereof; and when granted by a judge, it may be enforced as an order of the court.
Sumber terbuka

Feasibility has two parts. First, the court needs power over the defendant or the property; an order against a person outside the court’s jurisdiction is empty. Second, the court will not issue an order it would have to police day by day. Contracts for personal services and for long construction projects are the classic examples. California refuses specific performance of any obligation to render personal service (Cal. Civ. Code § 3390). The plaintiff is left with damages.

Balancing hardships compares the benefit of the order to the plaintiff with its cost to the defendant and the public. When the cost is grossly disproportionate, the court may deny the injunction and leave the plaintiff with damages. A building that crosses a boundary by a few inches is the standard example. Removal would cost far more than the strip of land is worth, so the court awards the value of the strip instead. Exception: a defendant who built knowing of the encroachment gets no balancing.

Equitable defenses

Equitable relief is discretionary, so the defendant may argue that the plaintiff does not deserve it. As a general rule, laches and unclean hands bar equitable remedies only. They do not bar damages. If one of them succeeds, return to step 2 of the attack order and award money. Exception: in California, unclean hands can also bar damages (see the box below). Estoppel, and unconscionability as a contract defense, can also defeat a damages claim.

laches – Unreasonable delay by the plaintiff in asserting a right that causes prejudice to the defendant. It can bar equitable relief even before the statute of limitations runs.

unclean hands – The plaintiff’s own serious misconduct in the same transaction. A court of equity will not help a plaintiff who acted wrongfully in the matter before the court.

Elemen

The five equitable defenses

Check each one against the facts, then say which apply:

  1. 1.Laches: Unreasonable delay plus prejudice (lost evidence, changed position, money spent in reliance).
  2. 2.Unclean hands: The plaintiff’s misconduct connected to the transaction: fraud, bad faith, illegality.
  3. 3.Estoppel: The plaintiff’s words or conduct led the defendant to rely; the plaintiff may not now claim otherwise. It can also defeat damages.
  4. 4.Unconscionability: The bargain was unfair or oppressive when made. Equity will not enforce it (Civ. Code § 3391); as a contract defense it also bars damages.
  5. 5.Impossibility: The defendant cannot perform the order, for example because the land was sold to a bona fide purchaser.

Satu saja sudah cukup.

Aturan

Laches

Laches requires (1) an unreasonable delay by the plaintiff in bringing the claim and (2) resulting prejudice to the defendant, or the plaintiff’s acquiescence in the wrong. Delay alone is not enough. Laches bars equitable claims only; a timely damages claim survives.

Aturan

Unclean hands

The doctrine of unclean hands denies equitable relief to a plaintiff whose own misconduct relates directly to the transaction in dispute. Unrelated bad acts do not count. The misconduct must also prejudice the defendant’s rights, so that granting relief would be unfair.

CAPerbedaan Kalifornia

Does unclean hands bar a damages claim?

Aturan umum (federal / mayoritas)

General rule: unclean hands is an equitable defense. It can defeat an injunction, specific performance or a constructive trust, but the plaintiff’s legal claim for damages survives.

Kalifornia

California applies unclean hands to legal claims as well as equitable ones. The plaintiff’s misconduct must relate directly to the transaction and make relief unfair (Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 970).

On a general-law call, write that unclean hands bars equity only. If the call names California law, add one sentence: in California the defense can also defeat the damages claim.

Contoh

Silence while the neighbor builds

A landowner learns that a neighbor’s new garage extends three feet onto her lot. She says nothing for two years while the neighbor finishes the garage, paves a driveway to it and takes out a loan secured by the property. She then sues for a mandatory injunction ordering removal.

Analisa

The delay was unreasonable: she knew the facts and had no excuse. The prejudice is clear: the neighbor spent money and changed position in reliance on her silence. Laches is likely to bar the injunction. Unclean hands does not apply, because she did nothing wrongful. Her damages claim for the trespass survives, subject to the statute of limitations.

Hasil

Injunction denied on laches; damages for the encroachment remain available if the claim is timely.

Poin penting

Equitable remedies are discretionary. Never write “the court will grant the injunction.” Write “the court is likely to grant the injunction because…” and then give the reason.

Kiat ujian

Write a defenses paragraph after every equitable remedy, even to say that none applies. Laches appeared on 12 and unclean hands on 11 of the last 50 exams; examiners plant the delay or the bad act in the facts.

Catatan penting

  1. 1.Prerequisites: inadequate legal remedy, feasible enforcement, and hardship to the defendant not greatly disproportionate to the benefit.
  2. 2.Interim relief adds likelihood of success and irreparable harm before trial (Winter; CCP § 527).
  3. 3.No order for personal services or for work the court cannot supervise (Civ. Code § 3390).
  4. 4.Five defenses; laches and unclean hands generally bar equitable relief only, while estoppel and unconscionability can also defeat damages.
  5. 5.Laches is unreasonable delay plus prejudice; unclean hands is the plaintiff’s related misconduct.
  6. 6.California exception: unclean hands can also defeat a damages claim (Kendall-Jackson).

1.6 The attack order, with a worked outline

Every Remedies essay uses the same order, whether the call names one remedy (“Can Ana obtain specific performance?”) or asks in general (“What remedies are available to Ana?”). The sequence finds every remedy the facts support and lets the grader tick each point quickly.

Elemen

The six-step attack order

Work through every step for each plaintiff:

  1. 1.Step 1: Identify the substantive wrong: breach of contract, tort, property injury or breach of fiduciary duty. The wrong fixes the measure.
  2. 2.Step 2: Legal damages: state the measure, apply causation, foreseeability and certainty, then mitigation. Add nominal or punitive damages if the facts fit.
  3. 3.Step 3: Restitution: legal first (quasi-contract, money for the benefit), then equitable (constructive trust, equitable lien, tracing into substitute property).
  4. 4.Step 4: Coercive relief: specific performance (contract) or injunction (tort, property). Elements: inadequacy, feasibility, hardship; interim relief if urgent.
  5. 5.Step 5: Equitable defenses: laches, unclean hands, estoppel, unconscionability, impossibility. Say which apply and which do not.
  6. 6.Step 6: Declaratory relief: add it when the parties need a ruling on their rights and no order is yet needed.

Semua elemen diperlukan.

A breach of contract leads to expectation damages under Cal. Civ. Code § 3300 and, if the subject is unique, specific performance. A tort leads to damages under § 3333, possibly punitive damages, and an injunction against continuing harm. Fraud opens rescission and a constructive trust. A breach of fiduciary duty opens disgorgement of the fiduciary’s profit. Name the wrong in one sentence, then move to damages.

Step 3 asks whether the defendant still holds something that belongs to the plaintiff. If the defendant holds identifiable property or its traceable proceeds, ask for a constructive trust or an equitable lien. If not, ask for a money judgment in quasi-contract. Step 4 asks whether the plaintiff needs a coercive remedy for the future. Write the adequacy sentence, the feasibility point and the hardship balance for each order you request.

Aturan

Declaratory relief (step 6)

In a case of actual controversy, a court may declare the rights and duties of the parties before any breach occurs, with or without other relief. The declaration binds the parties like any other judgment.

Step 5 is never skipped: test each equitable remedy against the five defenses. Step 6 is rare. Ask for a declaratory remedy when a party wants to know its rights before acting, for example whether a covenant is enforceable.

Hipotetis

Worked outline: the fraud-induced transfer (in the pattern of the July 2026 Remedies essay)

Ana owned a baseball signed by a famous player, worth $50,000, and had $100,000 in savings. Ben, a collector she trusted, told her the signature was a forgery and that the ball was worth $500. That statement was false, and Ben knew it. Ana sold the ball to Ben for $500. Ben then told Ana that he could invest her savings in a start-up company. No such company existed. Ana transferred $60,000 to Ben. Ben added $180,000 of his own savings to the $60,000 and bought a condominium for $240,000. The condominium is now worth $400,000. Ben gave the baseball to his nephew Dan as a birthday gift. Dan knew nothing about how Ben obtained it. Ana learned all of these facts two years ago. She did nothing until last month, while Ben spent $30,000 of his own money renovating the condominium. Ben has since spent his other savings and has no other significant assets. Ana now sues Ben and Dan.


What remedies can Ana obtain against Ben and Dan? Work through the six steps.

Analisa

Step 1, the wrong. Ben committed fraud (intentional misrepresentation) twice: the false statement about the signature induced the sale of the ball, and the fictional start-up induced the $60,000 transfer. Fraud is a tort, and it also makes the sale voidable. Step 2, damages. For the ball, the fraud measure for a sale of property (Cal. Civ. Code § 3343) is what Ana gave less what she received: $49,500. For the transfer, the general tort measure (§ 3333) gives $60,000. Causation, foreseeability and certainty are satisfied, and there was nothing to mitigate. Because fraud is a tort, punitive damages are available on clear and convincing proof of fraud (Cal. Civ. Code § 3294). Step 3, restitution. Ana may instead rescind the sale for fraud (Cal. Civ. Code § 1689(b)(1)), restore the $500 and reclaim the ball. Equitable restitution needs an inadequate legal remedy. The ball is unique, and Ben has no other significant assets, so a money judgment may not be collectible. Damages also could not capture the condominium’s appreciation. Ben holds what he gained by fraud as an involuntary trustee (Cal. Civ. Code § 2224), so Ana may ask for a constructive trust over the ball. A constructive trust follows the property into anyone’s hands except a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. Dan received the ball as a gift, so he gave no value; the trust reaches the ball in Dan’s hands. For the $60,000, Ana traces her money into the condominium: it paid one-fourth of the $240,000 price. She may choose a constructive trust over a one-fourth share (one-fourth of $400,000 is $100,000) or an equitable lien for $60,000 plus interest. Because the property has appreciated, the constructive trust is the better election. Step 4, coercive relief. Ana should seek a preliminary injunction during the case. The order would stop Dan from selling the ball and stop Ben from selling or encumbering the condominium. She is likely to succeed, the ball is unique, and the balance of hardships favors preserving the property. Step 5, defenses. Ben will argue laches: Ana waited two years while he spent $30,000 on renovations. The delay is real, but the prejudice is weak. Ben knew of his own fraud, so he did not rely on Ana’s silence. The claim is also within the three-year fraud statute (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(d)). The court is likely to reject laches, though it may credit Ben’s $30,000 of improvements against the trust share so that Ana is not herself unjustly enriched. If it does, Ana’s share is her $60,000 of the $270,000 invested (about 22 percent, roughly $89,000). That is still better than a $60,000 lien. Unclean hands fails because Ana did nothing wrong. Dan is not a bona fide purchaser, and impossibility does not arise because both assets still exist. Step 6, declaratory relief. Not needed; the orders above settle the parties’ rights. Conclusion. Ana should elect rescission and a constructive trust over the ball (reaching Dan) and over one-fourth of the condominium (about 22 percent if the renovation is credited), with an interim injunction to preserve both. Damages and punitive damages against Ben remain available in the alternative for any loss the property does not cover.

IRAC

Masalah
The issue is whether [plaintiff] can obtain [remedy] against [defendant] for [the wrong].
Aturan
State the remedy’s elements in one to three sentences. For damages: the measure, then causation, foreseeability, certainty and mitigation. For restitution: unjust enrichment and the defendant’s gain, with a constructive trust or equitable lien if the defendant holds identifiable property. For coercive relief: inadequate legal remedy, feasibility and balance of hardships; for interim relief add likelihood of success and irreparable harm. Name the source when it helps: “Under Civil Code section 3387, land is presumed unique.”
Aplikasi
Here, [fact] shows [element 1]. [Fact] shows [element 2]. Then the other side: “[Defendant] will argue that [defense or missing element]. However, [fact] shows [answer].” Compute every number the facts allow and show the arithmetic.
Kesimpulan
Therefore, the court is likely to [grant / deny] [remedy], and [plaintiff] should elect [remedy] because [reason].

Kiat ujian

Use the six steps as your headings: Wrong, Damages, Restitution, Specific performance or Injunction, Defenses, Declaratory relief. Under each heading, write IRAC. A step that does not apply gets one sentence saying so.

Catatan penting

  1. 1.Step 1 names the wrong; the wrong fixes the measure and the available orders.
  2. 2.Steps 2 and 3 are alternatives for money: the plaintiff’s loss or the defendant’s gain, never twice for the same loss.
  3. 3.Step 4 orders conduct only after the adequacy, feasibility and hardship points.
  4. 4.Step 5 tests every equitable remedy against the five defenses; step 6 adds a declaration when useful.
  5. 5.A constructive trust follows property into a donee’s hands but stops at a bona fide purchaser.

1.7 Review

This review has four multiple-choice questions and one mini-essay. Remedies is not an MBE subject, so the questions are practice for learning, not exam simulation. Answer each question before opening the explanation. For the mini-essay, set a timer for 15 minutes, outline with the six steps, and write your answer before reading the model. Then read the glossary and confirm that you can define each term in one sentence without looking.

waiver of tort – Suing for the defendant’s gain from a tort, such as the sale proceeds of converted goods, instead of the plaintiff’s loss. The claim is in restitution (quasi-contract).

Latihan · MBE

A buyer and a seller signed a written contract for the sale of a 10-acre parcel of farmland for $500,000, with closing in 60 days. The buyer intended to farm the land and had arranged financing. Two weeks before closing, the seller received an offer of $600,000 from a developer and told the buyer that he would not convey. The buyer tendered the full price on the closing date, and the seller refused it. The buyer sued the seller. Which remedy is the buyer most likely to obtain?
Pilih jawaban

Shift + huruf memberikan pilihan

Jawaban: A

Specific performance is the standard remedy for breach of a contract to sell land. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 3387, the breach of an agreement to transfer real property is presumed not to be adequately relieved by money. The inadequacy element is therefore met without proof that this parcel is special. The buyer performed by tendering the price, the contract is definite, and a single conveyance is simple to enforce. Option B assumes that land is fungible; the law presumes the opposite. Option C describes a form of interim relief, not the main remedy, and courts do order sellers to convey. Option D gives the buyer less than the bargain and ignores that the buyer wants the land itself.
Correct answer: A. Land is presumed unique, so damages are inadequate and the court orders the seller to convey. Ask for specific performance first; damages are the fallback if the seller has already conveyed to a bona fide purchaser.

Latihan · MBE

A plaintiff owned an industrial sewing machine worth $1,000. The defendant took the machine from the plaintiff’s shop without permission. A week later, the defendant sold the machine to a buyer for $5,000 in cash. The buyer then left the country with the machine, and neither the buyer nor the machine can be found. The plaintiff sued the defendant. What is the plaintiff’s best recovery?
Pilih jawaban

Shift + huruf memberikan pilihan

Jawaban: B

The defendant was unjustly enriched by $5,000 when he sold the plaintiff’s machine. The plaintiff may elect restitution measured by the defendant’s gain (waiver of tort and suit in quasi-contract) instead of the $1,000 tort measure. Option A states a correct measure of conversion damages, but it is not the best recovery when the defendant’s gain is larger. Option C is wrong because punitive damages are awarded in addition to actual damages, never alone. Option D is wrong because a lien needs property that the court can reach. The machine and the buyer cannot be found, so a lien on the machine gives the plaintiff nothing.
Correct answer: B. When the defendant’s gain exceeds the plaintiff’s loss, elect restitution. An equitable lien or constructive trust needs identifiable property that the court can reach. Here the machine is gone, so the money claim against the wrongdoer is the best route.

Latihan · MBE

A landowner sued a neighbor in federal court, alleging that the neighbor’s fence stood on the landowner’s side of the boundary. The landowner sought $20,000 in damages for the past trespass and a permanent injunction ordering removal of the fence. Assume that the federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction. Both claims depend on where the boundary lies, which the parties dispute. The neighbor timely demanded a jury. The landowner moved for the judge to decide the boundary in the injunction claim first and then apply that finding to the damages claim. How should the court proceed?
Pilih jawaban

Shift + huruf memberikan pilihan

Jawaban: B

The Seventh Amendment governs in federal court. Under Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 (1959), when legal and equitable claims share a factual issue, the legal claim goes to the jury first. The judge then decides the equitable claim without contradicting the jury’s finding. Option A ignores that the jury right attaches to the damages claim regardless of the injunction claim. Option C gives the jury an equitable claim, which the judge decides. Option D describes the sequence that Beacon Theatres rejected: a judge may not try the shared issue first in equity and bind the jury. In California state court, by contrast, the gist-of-the-action test governs and the judge may try the equitable issues first.
Correct answer: B. Legal issues first, to the jury; the judge follows with the equitable claim. Remember the California difference if the call names state court.

Latihan · MBE

A seller sold a house to a buyer for $400,000. The buyer had induced the sale by falsely telling the seller that a freeway would soon be built beside the house. Two years ago, the seller learned that the statement was false. The seller said nothing. During those two years the buyer, believing the sale was final, spent $200,000 adding a second story. The statute of limitations on the seller’s fraud claim has not run. The seller now sues to rescind the sale and to impose a constructive trust on the house, and also seeks damages for the fraud. What is the buyer’s best argument against the equitable relief?
Pilih jawaban

Shift + huruf memberikan pilihan

Jawaban: A

Laches bars equitable relief when the plaintiff unreasonably delayed in asserting a known right and the delay prejudiced the defendant. The seller knew of the fraud for two years and said nothing while the buyer spent $200,000 improving the house. That is prejudice, although a court may give it less weight because the buyer knew of his own fraud (compare the worked outline in section 6). Laches is still the buyer’s best argument, because every other option misstates the law. Laches can apply even though the statute of limitations has not run. Option B misstates the law: a fraud claim accrues when the fraud is discovered (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(d)), and the facts say the period has not run. Option C fails because unclean hands requires the plaintiff’s own misconduct in the transaction; the facts show only delay, which is a laches issue. Option D is wrong because laches is an equitable defense and does not bar a timely claim for damages.
Correct answer: A. Laches is the buyer’s best argument, although his prejudice may count for less because he knew of his own fraud. If laches succeeds, it bars only the equitable remedies; the timely damages claim survives.

Hipotetis

Mini-essay drill (15 minutes): the abandoned house

A homeowner hired a contractor to build a house for $150,000, payable in stages. The contractor knew that the homeowner planned to live in the house when it was finished. After the homeowner had paid $100,000, the contractor walked off the job with the house half built and refused to return. The homeowner obtained bids from three other builders. The lowest bid to finish the house according to the original plans is $90,000. A neutral appraiser valued the work the contractor had completed at $60,000. Because of the delay, the homeowner has rented an apartment for three extra months at $2,000 per month.


What remedies can the homeowner obtain against the contractor? Discuss.

Analisa

Wrong. The contractor’s abandonment is a total breach of a construction contract. The homeowner may treat the contract as ended and sue. Expectation damages. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 3300 the homeowner recovers the amount that puts her where full performance would have: the cost to complete less the unpaid contract price. The lowest reasonable bid is $90,000; the unpaid price is $50,000 ($150,000 less the $100,000 paid). Expectation damages are therefore $40,000. Causation is direct. The extra rent of $6,000 is consequential. The contractor knew that the homeowner planned to live in the house, so the rent was foreseeable at contracting under Hadley v. Baxendale and is recoverable. The amounts are certain: bids and rent receipts. Mitigation: obtaining three bids and choosing the lowest was reasonable, and the contractor bears the burden of showing anything more the homeowner could have done. Total: $46,000. Restitution. Alternatively, the homeowner may recover the $100,000 paid less the value of the work received ($60,000), which is $40,000. This measure gives no more than expectation here and drops the rent, so the homeowner should elect expectation damages. Specific performance. Not available. Damages are adequate, and a court will not supervise a construction project or compel personal services (Cal. Civ. Code § 3390). Defenses. The contractor has no equitable defense to raise against a damages claim, and no substantive excuse appears on the facts. Conclusion. The homeowner should recover $46,000 in expectation damages ($40,000 completion cost plus $6,000 foreseeable rent). Restitution is an inferior alternative, and specific performance is unavailable.

– A legal action to recover possession of specific personal property wrongfully taken or held, with damages for the detention.

– A legal action by an owner to recover possession of land from a person wrongfully in possession, with damages for the period of dispossession.

– A legal restitution claim for the value of a benefit conferred, imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment; no actual contract is needed.

– An equitable remedy that treats the holder of wrongfully obtained property as a trustee who must transfer it to the plaintiff.

– An equitable security interest imposed on the defendant’s property for the amount of the plaintiff’s claim, enforced by sale of the property.

– Following the plaintiff’s money or property into substitute assets the defendant acquired with it, so that a constructive trust or lien can attach.

– A person who buys property for value, in good faith and without notice of another’s claim; takes free of constructive trusts and liens.

– An equitable order that a party perform a contract as promised; available when the subject is unique and damages are inadequate.

– A court order that a person do a specified act (mandatory) or refrain from one (prohibitory), enforced by contempt.

– The court’s power to fine or jail a person who disobeys its order; the enforcement mechanism for equitable remedies.

– A restitutionary remedy requiring the defendant to give up profits gained through a wrong, such as a breach of fiduciary duty.

– Cancellation of a contract for fraud, mistake, duress or a similar ground, with each party restoring what it received.

Catatan penting

Chapter summary

  1. 1.Essay-only (76 percent of exams) and always built on a Contracts, Torts, Property or Business Associations wrong; general law applies unless California is called.
  2. 2.Legal remedies (money, jury, no discretion) versus equitable remedies (orders, judge, discretion, contempt); equity needs an inadequate legal remedy.
  3. 3.Four families: compensatory (plaintiff’s loss), restitutionary (defendant’s gain), coercive (order), declaratory (rights).
  4. 4.Damages pass three gates (causation, foreseeability, certainty) and are reduced by avoidable loss (mitigation).
  5. 5.Equitable relief needs inadequacy, feasibility and a favorable hardship balance; laches and unclean hands are the leading defenses.
  6. 6.Six steps every time: wrong, damages, restitution, coercive relief, defenses, declaratory relief.

Pihak berwenang dalam bab ini

Akhir bab 1

Tulislah jawaban atas apa yang baru saja Anda baca.

Esai berjangka waktu pada Solusi, dinilai berdasarkan rubrik California.

Isi

Pintasan keyboard

j
Bagian selanjutnya
k
Bagian sebelumnya
n
Bab selanjutnya
p
Bab sebelumnya
c
Isi
s
Ubah ukuran teks
t
Kembali ke atas
?
Tampilkan atau sembunyikan daftar ini