Proprietà reale · Capitolo 1 di 1
Present Estates and Future Interests
61 minSezioni 7Capitolo gratuito
The vocabulary that every other Real Property chapter uses: the present estates (fee simple absolute, the three defeasible fees, the life estate) and the future interests that follow them in the grantor (reversion, possibility of reverter, right of entry) and in grantees (vested and contingent remainders, class gifts, executory interests). The chapter then teaches the law of waste, the Rule Against Perpetuities with its California 90-year reform, the rule against restraints on alienation, and the California statutes that change the common-law labels.
Obiettivi di apprendimento
- 1.Classify any present estate from the words of the grant and name the future interest that follows it.
- 2.Distinguish vested, vested subject to open, vested subject to complete divestment and contingent remainders, and shifting from springing executory interests.
- 3.Identify affirmative, permissive and ameliorative waste and state the remedies of the future interest holder.
- 4.Test an interest under the common-law Rule Against Perpetuities and apply the California 90-year wait-and-see reform.
- 5.Recognize the California statutes that abolish the fee simple determinable, the fee tail, Shelley’s Case and Worthier Title, and void unreasonable restraints on alienation.
1.1 How Real Property is tested
Real Property is the law of land and the buildings on it: who owns it, for how long, who may use it, and how it is transferred. On the California Bar Exam it is tested twice, on the MBE and in the essays. This chapter teaches the vocabulary of estates and future interests. Every later chapter, from landlord and tenant to mortgages, uses these words, so learn them first.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| MBE weight | 25 scored questions of 175; about one-fifth each from ownership, rights in land, contracts, mortgages and titles |
| Essay frequency | Tested on 26 of the last 50 exams (52 percent); most recently February 2026 and February 2025 |
| Performance Test | The July 2025 Performance Test was a client advice letter on a Real Property problem |
| This chapter in essays (last 50 exams) | Defeasible fees 3; future interests 3; waste 2; Rule Against Perpetuities 1 |
| California law | Low weight: essays apply general law unless the call names California, and California distinctions are rarely essay-tested. In a Performance Test, use only the Library |
| NextGen exam (July 2028 and later) | Real Property is a foundational subject and stays on the exam |
The MBE is Day 2 of the exam: 200 questions in two three-hour sessions of 100 questions each. Only 175 questions are scored, 25 per subject; the other 25 are unscored test items. You have about 1.8 minutes per question. Real Property questions are long and fact-heavy, so speed comes from knowing the vocabulary without translating it in your head.
estate – An interest in land that is, or may become, possessory, and that is classified by how long it can last.
present estate – An estate that gives its holder the right to possess the land now.
future interest – A legally protected right in land whose possession begins, if at all, at a later time. The holder owns the interest today, even though possession is postponed.
grantor – The person who transfers an interest in land, by deed during life or by will at death. In this book, O is the grantor.
grantee – The person who receives an interest in land from the grantor. In this book, A, B and C are grantees.
Nota
The applicable-law sentence
The essay instructions say: “Unless a question expressly asks you to use California law, you should answer according to legal theories and principles of general application”. For Real Property, that means the common-law rules taught in this book. Add a California statute only when the call names California. On a silent call you may add one sentence noting a California difference, after the general-law answer.
Real Property essays are usually one story with several actors: a grantor, a life tenant, a buyer, a neighbor. The calls ask who owns what and what each person may do. Graders look for the correct name of each interest, the rule, and its application to the facts. Write the label and the reason together: “B has a vested remainder subject to complete divestment, because a later clause can take it away”.
Elementi
The Real Property attack order
Use these steps for any question about a grant. Chapter 12 teaches the full essay method.
- 1.Step 1: Read the words of the grant and identify each present estate.
- 2.Step 2: Name every future interest and say who holds it: the grantor or a grantee.
- 3.Step 3: Test each interest for validity: the Rule Against Perpetuities and restraints on alienation.
- 4.Step 4: Check whether an event has ended or divested an estate, and update the state of title.
- 5.Step 5: Ask what each holder may do now: possession, use, waste, transfer.
- 6.Step 6: State the remedy: damages, an injunction, or recovery of possession.
Tutti gli elementi richiesti.
Suggerimento per l'esame
The MBE and the essay reward the same first step: write the exact name of each interest before you analyze anything. A wrong label early produces a wrong answer later. Defeasible fees and future interests each appeared in 3 of the last 50 essays.
Punto chiave
Every grant creates one present estate and, unless it is a fee simple absolute, at least one future interest. Find both before you answer.
Note chiave
- 1.Real Property is 25 scored MBE questions and appears in about half of essay administrations.
- 2.Essays apply general law unless the call names California.
- 3.A present estate gives possession now; a future interest gives possession later, if at all.
- 4.Start every answer by naming each interest exactly, then test validity, events and rights.
1.2 Present estates: fee simple, defeasible fees, life estates and waste
A present estate is measured by how long it can last. The fee simple absolute can last forever. A defeasible fee ends on a stated event. A life estate ends at a death. This section teaches how to identify each estate from the words of the grant, and what a life tenant may do with the land.
fee simple absolute – The largest estate in land: it lasts forever, may be freely sold, given away or inherited, and no future interest follows it.Cal. Civ. Code § 762
heirs – The persons who take a decedent’s property under the intestacy statute. A living person has no heirs, only heirs apparent with a mere expectancy.
fee tail – An estate that passed only to the holder’s lineal descendants, created by “to A and the heirs of his body”. Abolished almost everywhere; the words now create a fee simple.
Defeasible fees
defeasible fee – A fee simple that ends, or can be ended, when a stated event happens. The three kinds differ in how the estate ends and who takes the land.
| Estate | Words that create it | What follows it | How it ends |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fee simple absolute | Words that create it“to A” or “to A and his heirs” | What follows itNothing | How it endsNever |
| Fee simple determinable | Words that create itWords of duration: “so long as”, “while”, “until”, “during” | What follows itPossibility of reverter in the grantor | How it endsAutomatically, the moment the event happens |
| Fee simple subject to a condition subsequent | Words that create itWords of condition: “but if”, “provided that”, “on condition that”, plus a right to re-enter | What follows itRight of entry (power of termination) in the grantor | How it endsOnly when the grantor exercises the right of entry |
| Fee simple subject to an executory limitation | Words that create itEither kind of words, with the land passing to a third person | What follows itExecutory interest in a grantee | How it endsAutomatically, the moment the event happens |
fee simple determinable – A fee simple that ends automatically when a stated event happens, so that the land returns to the grantor. It is created by words of duration.
fee simple subject to a condition subsequent – A fee simple that the grantor may end by re-entering after a stated event. Nothing happens until the grantor acts.
fee simple subject to an executory limitation – A fee simple that passes automatically to a third person, not to the grantor, when a stated event happens.
The difference between the first two defeasible fees matters. A fee simple determinable ends by itself: the grantee becomes a trespasser at once, and the period for adverse possession starts to run. A fee simple subject to a condition subsequent continues until the grantor acts. Courts dislike forfeiture, so unclear words are read as a condition subsequent.
Esempio
Drafting a determinable fee
A landowner conveys a lot to the city. The deed says: “to the city so long as the lot is used as a public park; if it is not, the lot shall revert to the grantor”. After 30 years, the city closes the park and leases the lot to a parking company.
Analisi
“So long as” and “revert” are words of duration. The city held a fee simple determinable, and the landowner kept a possibility of reverter. The estate ended automatically when the park use stopped. The landowner, or the landowner’s successors, now owns the lot in fee simple absolute.
Esempio
Drafting a condition subsequent
A landowner conveys a lot to a church. The deed says: “to the church, provided that no alcohol is sold on the premises; if it is, the grantor may re-enter and retake the land”. The church later rents its hall to a caterer who sells wine to guests.
Analisi
“Provided that” plus a stated right to re-enter creates a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. The caterer’s wine sales breach the condition, but the church keeps its fee until the grantor exercises the right of entry.
Life estates and waste
life estate – An estate that lasts for the life of a named person, usually the holder. It ends automatically at that person’s death.
life estate pur autre vie – A life estate measured by the life of a person other than the holder (French: “for another life”). If the holder dies first, the holder’s successors hold until that life ends.
A life estate is created by words such as “to A for life”. The life tenant may possess the land, take its ordinary income, and sell or lease the estate. A buyer gets only what the life tenant had: an estate that ends at the measuring death. The law of waste balances the life tenant against the holder of the future interest.
waste – Conduct by the holder of a present estate that harms, or permanently changes, the land to the injury of the holder of a future interest.
Elementi
Duties of the life tenant
The life tenant must:
- 1.Repairs: Make ordinary repairs to keep the property in the condition received, but not major improvements.
- 2.Taxes: Pay property taxes, but only up to the income or the rental value of the land.
- 3.Mortgage: Pay interest on an existing mortgage, up to the same limit; the future interest holder pays the principal.
- 4.Resources: Not remove timber or minerals, unless the land was already used for that purpose or the grant permits it.
- 5.Structures: Not tear down or rebuild structures, unless the change is reasonable because conditions have changed.
Tutti gli elementi richiesti.
Esempio
Permissive waste
A life tenant stops paying the property taxes and lets the roof leak for 3 years. The county records a tax lien, and water ruins the top floor.
Analisi
Failing to pay taxes and to make ordinary repairs is permissive waste. The holder of the future interest may recover damages, or pay the taxes and seek reimbursement.
Suggerimento per l'esame
MBE distractor: “the life tenant may use the land as an owner would”. True for ordinary use; false for cutting timber for sale or opening a new mine. Ask whether the act permanently reduces what the future interest holder receives.
Punto chiave
Determinable: ends by itself, words of duration. Condition subsequent: ends only when the grantor acts, words of condition. Executory limitation: the land passes to a third person.
Note chiave
- 1.A grant passes a fee simple absolute unless the words show a smaller estate; “and his heirs” is not required.
- 2.Words of duration create a fee simple determinable, which ends automatically; the grantor keeps a possibility of reverter.
- 3.Words of condition create a fee subject to a condition subsequent; the grantor must exercise the right of entry.
- 4.If the land passes to a third person on the event, the fee is subject to an executory limitation.
- 5.A life tenant is liable for affirmative and permissive waste; ameliorative change is allowed when conditions have changed.
1.3 Future interests in the grantor
When a grantor gives away less than the whole fee simple, something is left behind. That something is a future interest in the grantor. There are only three: the reversion, the possibility of reverter and the right of entry. Each one follows a particular kind of present estate, and each one is vested from the moment it is created. That last fact matters for the Rule Against Perpetuities in section 5.
reversion – The future interest that a grantor keeps after transferring a smaller estate, such as a life estate, without giving away the rest.Cal. Civ. Code § 768
possibility of reverter – The future interest kept by a grantor who conveys a fee simple determinable. It becomes possessory automatically when the stated event happens.
right of entry – The future interest kept by a grantor who conveys a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. Also called a power of termination. The grantor must exercise it.
| Interest | Follows | Becomes possessory | Transferable? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reversion | FollowsA life estate, a term of years, or any estate smaller than the grantor’s | Becomes possessoryAutomatically, when the prior estate ends | Transferable?Yes, during life and at death, in every state |
| Possibility of reverter | FollowsA fee simple determinable | Becomes possessoryAutomatically, when the event happens | Transferable?Yes in most states. California converts it into a power of termination (Civ. Code § 885.020) |
| Right of entry (power of termination) | FollowsA fee simple subject to a condition subsequent | Becomes possessoryOnly when the grantor gives notice or sues to retake the land | Transferable?Passes by will and inheritance. Transfer by deed: traditionally not allowed; the modern trend and California allow it (Civ. Code § 1046) |
Punto chiave
All three interests in the grantor are vested when created. They are never subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities, and they can last forever unless a statute limits them.
The reason is historical. The grantor never gave these interests away, so nothing “vests” later; the grantor simply keeps what was already owned. These interests are property, so a reversion, a possibility of reverter and a right of entry all pass to the grantor’s heirs or devisees at death. A will that gives “all my property” carries them with it.
Esempio
The silent deed
O, who owns Blackacre in fee simple absolute, conveys Blackacre “to A for life”. The deed says nothing more. A later conveys “all my interest in Blackacre” to B.
Analisi
O gave away only a life estate, so O keeps a reversion. A’s deed to B transfers a life estate pur autre vie, measured by A’s life. When A dies, B’s estate ends and O, or O’s successors, takes possession under the reversion.
Risultato
State of title: B has a life estate pur autre vie; O has a reversion in fee simple.
The right of entry is the weakest of the three because it needs action. The grantor must give notice or sue to retake the land, and courts require the grantor to act within a reasonable time after the breach. California adds statutory time limits on a power of termination; section 6 gives them. A grantor who knows of the breach and does nothing for years may find that laches or the statute of limitations has barred the claim.
Ipotetico
The grantor who waited
In 2000, O conveyed a farm to A by deed. The deed said: “to A, but if the farm is ever used for anything other than farming, O may re-enter and retake the farm”. In 2005, A opened a car dealership on the farm. O knew about it but did nothing. In 2026, after a family argument, O sued to recover the farm. A statute in the jurisdiction provides that an action to enforce a right of entry must be brought within 10 years after the breach of the condition.
Can O recover the farm?
Analisi
The issue is whether O’s right of entry survived 21 years of inaction. Under the general rule, the words “but if” together with “may re-enter” create a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. O kept a right of entry, and A’s estate did not end by itself in 2005. Here, the statute required O to act within 10 years after the breach, which occurred in 2005. O sued in 2026, 11 years too late. A will argue, correctly, that the right of entry is now unenforceable. Therefore, O cannot recover the farm, and A holds it in fee simple absolute. Compare words of duration (“so long as the farm is used for farming”). The estate would then have ended by itself in 2005. The question would instead be whether A had acquired title by adverse possession since then.
IRAC
- Problema
- Whether [grantee]’s estate in [the land] ended when [the event] happened, and who now holds the land.
- Regola
- Words of duration (“so long as”, “while”, “until”) create a fee simple determinable. It ends automatically when the stated event happens, and the grantor’s possibility of reverter becomes possessory. Words of condition (“but if”, “provided that”) with a right to re-enter create a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent. It continues until the grantor exercises the right of entry. Words of mere purpose create neither. When the words are unclear, courts prefer the condition subsequent because it avoids forfeiture.
- Applicazione
- Here, the deed says “[quote the words of the grant]”. [These are words of duration, so [grantee] held a fee simple determinable and [grantor] kept a possibility of reverter. / These are words of condition with a right to re-enter, so [grantee] held a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent and [grantor] kept a right of entry.] On [date], [describe the event], which is the stated event. [The estate ended by itself at that moment, and no action was needed. / The estate continued; [grantor] had to exercise the right of entry, and [did / did not] do so within the time allowed.] [Grantee] will argue that the words only state a purpose. However, the deed [contains a reverter clause / states a right to re-enter], so that argument fails.
- Conclusione
- Therefore, [grantor or successor] [owns the land in fee simple absolute / may retake the land by re-entry / has lost the right].
Suggerimento per l'esame
When the land returns to the grantor, the interest is a reversion, a possibility of reverter or a right of entry. It is never a remainder or an executory interest. A common wrong answer calls the grantor’s interest an “executory interest”.
Note chiave
- 1.A reversion is what a grantor keeps after conveying a smaller estate than the grantor owns.
- 2.A possibility of reverter follows a fee simple determinable and takes effect automatically.
- 3.A right of entry follows a fee subject to a condition subsequent and must be exercised in time.
- 4.All three are vested at creation and never subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities.
1.4 Future interests in grantees: remainders, executory interests and class gifts
A future interest can also be given to a grantee, a person other than the grantor. There are two families: remainders and executory interests. A remainder waits for the prior estate to end; an executory interest cuts an estate short. Inside the remainder family, the labels vested and contingent decide whether the Rule Against Perpetuities applies.
remainder – A future interest in a grantee that becomes possessory, if at all, immediately when the prior estate ends naturally. It never cuts the prior estate short.
Vested or contingent?
condition precedent – An event, other than the natural end of the prior estate, that must happen before a remainder can become possessory. It sits inside the words that create the remainder.
condition subsequent – An event, stated in a separate later clause, that takes away an interest already given. It divests; it does not delay.
vested remainder – A remainder given to an ascertained person and not subject to any condition precedent. It becomes possessory when the prior estate ends, unless a condition subsequent divests it first.
contingent remainder – A remainder given to an unascertained person, or subject to a condition precedent, or both. It may never become possessory.
Elementi
A remainder is vested only if both are true
- 1.Ascertained taker: The taker is a born, identified person: not “A’s heirs” while A lives, not “A’s first child” when A has none.
- 2.No condition precedent: Nothing stands between the taker and possession except the natural end of the prior estate.
Tutti gli elementi richiesti.
Read the punctuation. A condition inside the words that create the gift is a condition precedent, and the remainder is contingent: “to B if B survives A”. A condition in a later clause that takes away a complete gift is a condition subsequent. The remainder is then vested subject to complete divestment: “to B, but if B dies before A, to C”.
vested remainder subject to open – A vested remainder given to a class, such as “A’s children”, when at least one member exists and more members can still join and reduce each share.
vested remainder subject to complete divestment – A vested remainder that a condition subsequent can take away entirely, before or after it becomes possessory.
| Remainder | Example | Why | Tested by the Rule Against Perpetuities? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indefeasibly vested | Example“then to B” | WhyB is ascertained; no condition | Tested by the Rule Against Perpetuities?No |
| Vested subject to open | Example“then to A’s children” (A has one child) | WhyClass gift with a living member; more may join | Tested by the Rule Against Perpetuities?Yes, until the class closes |
| Vested subject to complete divestment | Example“then to B, but if B dies without issue, to C” | WhyGift complete; a later clause can take it away | Tested by the Rule Against Perpetuities?No, but C’s executory interest is |
| Contingent | Example“then to B if B reaches 21” or “then to A’s heirs” | WhyCondition precedent, or an unascertained taker | Tested by the Rule Against Perpetuities?Yes |
class gift – A gift to a group described by a shared characteristic, such as “children” or “grandchildren”, whose membership can change until the class closes.
Apply the rule to “to A for life, then to A’s children”. The class gift stays open while A lives and closes at A’s death. Every child of A takes an equal share. A child who died before A still takes through that child’s estate, because the gift has no survival condition.
Executory interests
executory interest – A future interest in a grantee that becomes possessory by cutting short another estate, either a grantee’s estate (shifting) or the grantor’s estate (springing).
shifting executory interest – An executory interest that divests another grantee on an event: “to A, but if A stops farming the land, to B”.
springing executory interest – An executory interest that divests the grantor on an event: “to A when A marries”. The grantor keeps possession until then.
| Feature | Remainder | Executory interest |
|---|---|---|
| Follows | RemainderA life estate or a term of years | Executory interestAny estate it cuts short: usually a fee simple (shifting), or the grantor’s own estate (springing) |
| Takes effect | RemainderWhen the prior estate ends naturally | Executory interestBy cutting the prior estate short |
| Rule Against Perpetuities | RemainderApplies only if contingent or subject to open | Executory interestAlways applies |
Esempio
Shifting and springing
Deed 1: O conveys “to A, but if the land is ever used for a factory, to B”. Deed 2: O conveys “to C, to take effect when C is admitted to the bar”. C is a law student.
Analisi
Deed 1: A has a fee simple subject to an executory limitation, and B has a shifting executory interest, because B would cut short A, another grantee. Deed 2: O keeps a fee simple subject to an executory limitation, and C has a springing executory interest, because C would cut short O, the grantor. Neither has a remainder: B cuts short a fee, and C cuts short the grantor’s fee.
On the MBE, treat Shelley’s Case and destructibility as abolished unless the question says otherwise. Where Worthier Title survives, it is only a rule of construction that yields to the grantor’s contrary intent. A contingent remainder is not destroyed when the life estate ends; the grantor’s reversion holds the land until the condition happens.
alternative contingent remainders – Two contingent remainders with opposite conditions, so that when one vests the other must fail: “to B if B survives A, otherwise to C”.
Ipotetico
Classify every interest
O conveys Greenacre “to A for life, then to B if B survives A, and if B does not survive A, to C”. A, B and C are alive and unrelated.
Classify every interest in Greenacre. What changes if B dies before A?
Analisi
The issue is the state of title. A has a life estate. B has a contingent remainder, because the gift to B is subject to a condition precedent, surviving A, that sits inside the words of the gift. C also has a contingent remainder, subject to the opposite condition; B and C hold alternative contingent remainders. O keeps a reversion, because the law treats two contingent remainders as if both could fail. Both remainders pass the Rule Against Perpetuities, because each will vest or fail at A’s death. If B dies before A, B’s remainder fails. Therefore, the state of title becomes: A, life estate; C, indefeasibly vested remainder in fee simple absolute; O, nothing.
Suggerimento per l'esame
Essay: graders look for the correct label and the reason. Write both in one sentence: “B has a contingent remainder because the gift is subject to a condition precedent, survival of A”.
Punto chiave
Condition inside the gift: contingent. Condition in a later clause: vested subject to divestment. Class with a living member: vested subject to open.
Note chiave
- 1.A remainder follows a life estate or term of years and never cuts an estate short.
- 2.Vested: ascertained taker and no condition precedent. Contingent: unascertained taker or a condition precedent.
- 3.A class gift with a living member is vested subject to open; the class closes under the rule of convenience.
- 4.An executory interest cuts short a grantee’s estate (shifting) or the grantor’s estate (springing).
- 5.Shelley’s Case and destructibility are abolished almost everywhere; Worthier Title in many states, including California.
1.5 The Rule Against Perpetuities and its reforms
The Rule Against Perpetuities stops a grantor from keeping land out of the market for generations through interests that may vest far in the future. For each contingent interest, ask one question: is it certain to vest or fail within the period? If not, it is void.
vest – An interest vests when the taker is ascertained and every condition precedent is satisfied. A class gift vests fully only when the class closes.
life in being – A person alive, or already conceived, when the interest is created. A useful measuring life is one whose death affects when the interest vests.
Elementi
Interests the rule tests
The rule tests only interests not yet vested at creation:
- 1.Contingent remainders.
- 2.Executory interests, shifting and springing.
- 3.Vested remainders subject to open (class gifts), until the class closes.
- 4.Options to purchase and rights of first refusal held in gross (not attached to a lease).
Uno qualsiasi è sufficiente.
Elementi
Interests the rule never tests
- 1.Reversions, possibilities of reverter and rights of entry: the grantor’s interests are vested.
- 2.Indefeasibly vested remainders, and vested remainders subject to complete divestment.
- 3.Gifts from one charity to another charity.
- 4.An option held by the tenant under a lease, to buy the leased land during the lease.
Uno qualsiasi è sufficiente.
Mnemonico
CELA
- C– Classify the interest: is it one the rule tests?
- E– Event: what must happen for the interest to vest?
- L– Lives in being: who is alive now and connected to that event?
- A– Ask: could the event happen more than 21 years after every life in being dies?
If the answer is yes, strike the interest and read the grant again without it.
Esempio
Deed versus will
In her will, a testator leaves her farm “to my grandchildren who reach 21”. By deed, a living landowner conveys a lot “to my grandchildren who reach 21”. Each has 2 living children and 1 grandchild, aged 5.
Analisi
The will is valid. The testator is dead, so she can have no more children. Her two children are lives in being; every grandchild must reach 21, or die, within 21 years after the last child dies. The deed is void. The living landowner might have another child, who is not a life in being, and that child’s children could reach 21 too late.
Risultato
Lives in being are fixed at creation: death for a will, delivery for a deed.
Elementi
Classic traps
Each of these voids an interest that looks safe:
- 1.Fertile octogenarian: The law assumes that any living person, at any age, can have another child.
- 2.Unborn widow: “To A for life, then to A’s widow for life, then to A’s children then living”: the widow may not yet be born.
- 3.Slothful executor: A gift “when my estate is settled” may vest too late, because settlement has no time limit.
- 4.Age over 21: “To A’s children who reach 25” fails while A is alive, because a later child could reach 25 too late.
Uno qualsiasi è sufficiente.
Esempio
The fertile octogenarian
In Jee v. Audley (1787), a testator gave money to Mary Hall and her descendants. If her line ended, the money was to go to the daughters “then living” of John and Elizabeth Jee. The Jees were about 70 and had 4 daughters.
Analisi
The gift to the Jee daughters was void. The Jees might have another daughter, who was not a life in being. Mary Hall’s line might end more than 21 years after everyone then alive had died.
Options
Caso
Symphony Space, Inc. v. Pergola Properties, Inc., 88 N.Y.2d 466 (1996) (New York Court of Appeals 1996)
Fatti
A property company sold a building to a theater company for $10,010 and leased back the commercial space. It kept an option to buy the building back in 4 specified years, the last 25 years after the sale. The option covered the whole building, including the theater, and was in a separate agreement independent of the lease.
Presa
The option was an interest in land subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities and was void, because it could be exercised more than 21 years after its creation. The court refused to wait and see.
Perché è importante
An option to buy is subject to the rule unless it is part of a lease, limited to the leased premises and exercisable only during the lease. This option failed that test.
Reforms
wait-and-see – A reform under which a court judges an interest by the events that actually happen during the period, not by what might happen.
cy pres – French for “as near as possible”. A court rewrites an invalid provision to match the grantor’s intent as closely as possible, for example by reducing an age of 25 to 21.
StatutoCA
Cal. Prob. Code § 21205
Prob. Code § 21205
A nonvested property interest is invalid unless one of the following conditions is satisfied: (a) When the interest is created, it is certain to vest or terminate no later than 21 years after the death of an individual then alive. (b) The interest either vests or terminates within 90 years after its creation.Fonte aperta
In plain English: an interest is valid if it passes the common-law test, or if it actually vests or fails within 90 years. If not, the court reforms the instrument to carry out the transferor’s plan (Cal. Prob. Code § 21220). Exception: the statute does not apply to most commercial (nondonative) transfers, such as an option bought in a business deal (Cal. Prob. Code § 21225).
Suggerimento per l'esame
MBE: an option to buy land, held by a stranger with no time limit, is void under the common-law rule. An option held by a tenant, exercisable during the lease, is valid. The wrong answer swaps the two. Essay frequency: 1 of the last 50 exams.
Punto chiave
Never ask whether the interest will vest in time. Ask whether it could possibly vest too late. One unlikely sequence of births and deaths voids the interest.
Note chiave
- 1.The common-law rule voids an interest that might vest more than 21 years after every life in being dies.
- 2.It tests contingent remainders, executory interests, open class gifts and options in gross; never the grantor’s interests.
- 3.Method: classify, find the vesting event, find the lives in being, ask whether vesting could come too late.
- 4.Traps: fertile octogenarian, unborn widow, slothful executor, ages over 21.
- 5.California: valid if it vests within 90 years; otherwise the court reforms the instrument (Prob. Code §§ 21205, 21220).
1.6 Restraints on alienation and the California statutes
Land should be free to move from owner to owner. A grantor who tries to keep land in the family forever, or to forbid a sale, is limited by the rule against restraints on alienation. This section teaches that rule and the California statutes that change this chapter’s common-law vocabulary. California distinctions are rarely essay-tested. In a Performance Test, use only the Library; knowing the common-law vocabulary helps you read a statute there quickly.
restraint on alienation – A provision in a grant that limits the holder’s power to transfer the land. It may forbid transfer, forfeit the estate on transfer, or extract a promise not to transfer.
Elementi
Three forms of restraint
- 1.Disabling: Any attempted transfer is void (“A may not transfer the land”). Always void when placed on a fee.
- 2.Forfeiture: The estate ends if the holder tries to transfer (“but if A transfers the land, to B”).
- 3.Promissory: The holder promises not to transfer; breach gives damages or an injunction, not forfeiture.
Uno qualsiasi è sufficiente.
StatutoCA
Cal. Civ. Code § 711
Civ. Code § 711 (restraints on alienation)
Conditions restraining alienation, when repugnant to the interest created, are void.Fonte aperta
In plain English: a condition is “repugnant” to a fee simple when it takes away the freedom to sell that a fee simple includes. Such a condition has no effect. California courts read Cal. Civ. Code § 711 as a rule of reason. They weigh the reason for the restraint against how much it limits transfer. A limited, reasonable restraint may survive. A flat ban on selling a fee simple does not.
Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 shows this rule of reason at work. The lender threatened to demand full payment of a home loan unless the buyer of the house agreed to a higher interest rate. The court held that automatic enforcement of this due-on-sale clause was an unreasonable restraint. The lender had to show that the sale impaired its security or increased the risk of default. Federal law now overrides this result for most loans (12 U.S.C. § 1701j-3); chapter 11 covers due-on-sale clauses.
Esempio
The daughter who may never sell
A father deeds a house to his daughter. The deed says: “to my daughter, on condition that she never sells or mortgages it”. The daughter signs a contract to sell the house 2 years later. The buyer asks whether she can deliver good title.
Analisi
The condition is an absolute restraint on a fee simple. It is void, and the daughter owns the house in fee simple absolute, free to sell or mortgage. Civil Code § 711 and the common law give the same result. Contrast a deed that gave the daughter only a life estate. A restraint on transfer of a life estate would likely be enforced.
Risultato
The daughter can deliver good title; the buyer takes free of the condition.
California statutes that change the vocabulary
StatutoCA
Cal. Civ. Code § 885.020
Civ. Code § 885.020 (Marketable Record Title Act)
Fees simple determinable and possibilities of reverter are abolished. Every estate that would be at common law a fee simple determinable is deemed to be a fee simple subject to a restriction in the form of a condition subsequent. Every interest that would be at common law a possibility of reverter is deemed to be and is enforceable as a power of termination.Fonte aperta
StatutoCA
Cal. Civ. Code § 763
Civ. Code § 763 (estates tail abolished)
Estates tail are abolished, and every estate which would be at common law adjudged to be a fee tail is a fee simple; and if no valid remainder is limited thereon, is a fee simple absolute.Fonte aperta
Two practical consequences follow. First, a recorded power of termination is a cloud on title for a California title examiner. It expires on its own after 30 years, unless the holder records a notice to preserve it. Second, a contingent remainder or a right of re-entry can be sold in California (Cal. Civ. Code § 699; Cal. Civ. Code § 1046). A buyer of a future interest takes a real property right, not a mere expectancy.
Suggerimento per l'esame
Performance Test: if the Library contains a statute on estates or future interests, apply its words, not the common-law labels from this chapter. Graders reward the statute’s vocabulary, and the File usually contains the fact that triggers it.
Punto chiave
Absolute restraint on a fee: void, and the grantee takes the fee free. Reasonable partial restraint, or a restraint on a life estate: usually valid.
Note chiave
- 1.An absolute restraint on transfer of a fee simple is void; reasonable partial restraints may be valid.
- 2.Restraints on life estates and leaseholds are usually enforceable.
- 3.Civil Code § 711 voids restraints repugnant to the interest created; California courts apply a rule of reason.
- 4.California abolished the fee simple determinable and the possibility of reverter (Civ. Code § 885.020).
- 5.Fee tail, Shelley’s Case and Worthier Title are abolished in California (Civ. Code §§ 763, 779; Prob. Code § 21108).
1.7 Review
This review has 3 parts: a chapter summary, 5 MBE-style questions, and the glossary. Answer each question in under 2 minutes before opening the answer. Then read the explanation for every option, not only the one you chose, because the distractors are the labels you will confuse under time pressure. Finally, cover each glossary definition and say it in your own words, in English.
Read each MBE stem in the same order every time. First find the words of the grant, usually inside quotation marks. Second, note the dates and who is alive. Third, read the call: “who owns”, “what interest”, or “will the plaintiff prevail”. Only then read the options. The correct option names the interest and gives the reason that matches the words of the grant.
Elementi
Classifying any grant in six steps
- 1.Step 1: Find the present estate from the words: duration words, condition words, “for life”, or none.
- 2.Step 2: Ask who takes when the present estate ends: nobody named (the grantor keeps something) or a grantee.
- 3.Step 3: For a grantee: does the interest wait for a natural end (remainder) or cut an estate short (executory interest)?
- 4.Step 4: For a remainder: ascertained taker and no condition precedent means vested; otherwise contingent; a class means subject to open.
- 5.Step 5: Run the Rule Against Perpetuities on every contingent remainder, executory interest and open class.
- 6.Step 6: Check restraints on alienation, and any event that has already ended or divested an estate.
Tutti gli elementi richiesti.
state of title – A list of every interest in a parcel of land at a given moment, with the name of each holder.
Punto chiave
If you can classify a grant in under a minute, every Real Property question about title becomes a question about what happens next.
Pratica · MBE
Shift + lettera seleziona un'opzione
Risposta: B
Pratica · MBE
Shift + lettera seleziona un'opzione
Risposta: C
Pratica · MBE
Shift + lettera seleziona un'opzione
Risposta: A
Pratica · MBE
Shift + lettera seleziona un'opzione
Risposta: D
Pratica · MBE
Shift + lettera seleziona un'opzione
Risposta: A
– The transfer of an interest in land from one person to another, by sale, gift or will.
– A person who is born and identified at the moment the question is asked, so that a court could name the taker.
– A transfer of an interest in land by a written instrument, usually a deed, during the transferor’s life.
– A gift of land by will. The person who receives it is the devisee.
– Held personally by a person, not attached to the ownership of other land or to a lease.
– A person’s lineal descendants: children, grandchildren and later generations. “Without issue” means leaving no living descendant.
– The life whose end fixes the end of a life estate, or the life in being used to test an interest under the rule.
– The modern name for a right of entry: the grantor’s power to end a fee simple after a condition subsequent is broken.
– Words that describe the size of the estate given, such as “and his heirs” or “for life”; they give nothing to the persons named.
– Words that identify who takes an interest, such as “to A” or “then to A’s children.”
Note chiave
Chapter summary
- 1.A fee simple absolute lasts forever; defeasible fees end on an event; a life estate ends at a death.
- 2.Grantor’s future interests: reversion, possibility of reverter, right of entry; all vested, never subject to the rule.
- 3.Grantee’s future interests: remainders (vested or contingent) and executory interests (shifting or springing).
- 4.A life tenant is liable for affirmative and permissive waste; ameliorative change is allowed when conditions have changed.
- 5.The Rule Against Perpetuities voids interests that might vest more than 21 years after all lives in being die.
- 6.California: 90-year wait-and-see; no determinable fee; no fee tail, Shelley’s Case or Worthier Title.
Autorità in questo capitolo
Fine del capitolo 1
Metti in pratica ciò che hai appena letto.
2 domande da questo capitolo, con una spiegazione per ogni opzione.