遺言・相続法 · 第1章(全1章)
Intestate Succession and the Effect of Death on Marital Property
74分7セクション無料チャプター
This chapter explains what passes at death without a will, and to whom, under the California Probate Code. It separates probate from nonprobate property, splits community and quasi-community property at death under Probate Code §§ 100 to 102, and applies the 120-hour and simultaneous-death rules. It then computes the surviving spouse’s share (§ 6401) and the other heirs’ shares (§ 6402), divides among descendants under §§ 240, 246 and 247, and closes with four California practice items and a mini-essay.
学習目標
- 1.Separate probate property from nonprobate property such as joint tenancy, payable-on-death accounts, life insurance, retirement accounts and revocable trusts.
- 2.Apply Probate Code §§ 100 to 102 to community and quasi-community property at death.
- 3.Apply the survival rules: simultaneous death (§§ 220 to 224) and the 120-hour rule (§ 6403).
- 4.Compute the surviving spouse’s intestate share under § 6401 and the other heirs’ shares under § 6402.
- 5.Distribute an estate among descendants under §§ 240, 246 and 247.
1.1 How Wills and Succession is tested and what this chapter covers
Wills and Succession answers one question: when a person dies, who receives the property? California answers it with the Probate Code. A valid will speaks first. If there is no will, or the will fails in whole or in part, a statute decides who takes. This chapter teaches that statute, because every Wills answer can end there.
Wills and Succession is one of the six essay-only subjects; it never appears on the MBE. It was tested on 23 of the last 50 administrations. It is often a crossover: one question mixes Wills with Community Property or with Trusts.
| Item | What the data says |
|---|---|
| MBE weight | None. Wills and Succession is tested only in the written essays. |
| Essay frequency | 23 of the last 50 administrations (46 percent). |
| Recent crossovers | With Community Property in July 2021, July 2022 and July 2026; with Trusts in February 2025. July 2026 is our unofficial classification. |
| Top tested rules | Omitted child on 14 of 50 exams; execution requirements 12; holographic wills 12; intestate distribution 8; omitted spouse 5. |
| Applicable law | California law. The State Bar’s Content Map lists the Probate Code sections to know, including §§ 100 to 103, 240 and 6400 to 6402. |
| Exam horizon | Current format: February 2027, July 2027 and February 2028. NextGen, from July 2028, tests this subject only with provided resources. |
注記
The applicable-law default
The essay instructions tell you to answer under ‘legal theories and principles of general application’ unless the question expressly asks for California law. Wills and Succession calls almost always name California law. When one does, cite the Probate Code by section number.
Five words you need first
This subject uses a small, exact vocabulary, and every later chapter uses these five words. Watch two points. First, an heir takes under the intestacy statute, while a beneficiary takes under a will. Second, ‘issue’ in this subject means descendants, not the legal question in IRAC.
decedent – A person who has died. In this subject, the decedent is the person whose property is being distributed.
intestate – Having no valid will at death. Property that a valid will does not effectively give away also passes by intestate succession.
heir – Anyone, including the surviving spouse, whom the intestacy statute entitles to inherit (Prob. Code § 44). Will takers are called beneficiaries.Cal. Prob. Code § 44
issue – All of a person’s lineal descendants in every generation: children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and so on (Prob. Code § 50). Not the ‘issue’ of IRAC.Cal. Prob. Code § 50
probate estate – Property that passes under the decedent’s will or by intestacy. Nonprobate assets, such as joint tenancy property, life insurance and trust property, are outside it.
Why intestacy is the backbone
Every Wills answer follows the property through the same four steps. First, remove the assets that pass outside probate, such as joint tenancy property and life insurance. Second, split the marital property in half. Community property is property acquired during marriage while living in California. Quasi-community property is property acquired while living elsewhere that would have been community property here. Third, apply any valid will to the probate estate. Fourth, anything the will does not effectively give away passes by intestacy.
Intestacy also measures other rights. An omitted child is born or adopted after the decedent signed the last will or codicil (an amendment to a will). That child takes a share equal to the child’s intestate share (§ 21620). This is the most tested rule in the subject. An omitted spouse married the decedent after the last will or codicil. That spouse takes the decedent’s half of the community and quasi-community property, plus the intestate share of separate property, capped at one-half (§ 21610).
The halves explain the frequent crossover with Community Property. Classify each asset before you apply the will or intestacy. July 2026 Question 2 combined quasi-community property at death with an omitted-spouse claim. In a Trusts crossover, first ask whether a funded revocable trust already holds the property, because trust property is outside the probate estate.
What this chapter covers
Section 2 separates probate from nonprobate property. Section 3 splits marital property at death under §§ 100 to 102. Section 4 covers survival. Sections 5 and 6 compute the shares of the spouse, the issue and the other heirs. Section 7 reviews the chapter with four practice questions and one short essay.
要素
The Wills and Succession attack order
Work through a Wills essay in this order. Chapter 9 teaches the full method.
- 1.Step 1: Remove nonprobate assets: joint tenancy, payable-on-death (POD) accounts, life insurance, retirement accounts and trust property.
- 2.Step 2: Classify each asset. Give the surviving spouse one-half of the community and quasi-community property.
- 3.Step 3: Validity of the will: capacity, execution, holographic wills, undue influence and fraud.
- 4.Step 4: Components: integration, incorporation by reference, acts of independent significance and codicils.
- 5.Step 5: Revocation and revival.
- 6.Step 6: Construction: lapse and anti-lapse, ademption and abatement.
- 7.Step 7: Omitted spouse and omitted child claims.
- 8.Step 8: Intestacy for everything a valid will does not effectively give away.
どれでも十分です。
試験のヒント
Before you apply any will or intestacy rule, list each asset and label it: probate or nonprobate, then community, quasi-community or separate. Split community and quasi-community property in half first, because a wrong split changes every later number. Intestate distribution: 8 of the last 50 exams.
重要なメモ
- 1.Wills and Succession is essay-only, tested on 23 of the last 50 exams, often as a crossover, almost always under California law.
- 2.Follow the attack order: nonprobate assets, marital split, validity, components, revocation, construction, omitted heirs, intestacy.
- 3.Remove nonprobate assets and split community and quasi-community property before you apply a will.
- 4.Intestacy (Prob. Code §§ 6400 to 6402) governs anything a valid will does not effectively give away.
- 5.Learn five exact words: decedent, intestate, heir, issue and probate estate.
1.2 Probate vs nonprobate property
Before you apply a will or the intestacy rules, ask one question first: which property is part of the estate at all? Many assets pass at death by contract, by the form of title or by a trust. Neither the will nor the intestacy rules control them. If you send such an asset through the will or through intestacy, the whole distribution goes wrong.
nonprobate transfer – A transfer at death that takes effect under a contract, a form of title or a trust, so the property passes outside the will and outside probate.Cal. Prob. Code § 5000
right of survivorship – The feature of joint tenancy and similar titles: when one owner dies, that owner’s share ends and the surviving owner holds the whole property.
Probate is the court-supervised process that settles a decedent’s estate. A personal representative collects the probate estate, pays the debts and distributes the rest to the persons named in the will or to the heirs. A nonprobate transfer skips this process. The property goes directly to the surviving owner, the named beneficiary or the trust beneficiaries.
要素
The main nonprobate assets
Each asset below passes outside the will and outside intestacy:
- 1.Joint tenancy: The surviving joint tenant takes the whole property by right of survivorship.
- 2.Community property with right of survivorship: A California form of title for spouses. The surviving spouse takes the decedent’s half without probate.
- 3.Joint and POD bank accounts: The balance goes to the surviving account party or to the payable-on-death (POD) payee.
- 4.TOD registrations and TOD deeds: Securities registered transfer on death (TOD), and real property under a valid TOD deed, go to the named beneficiary.
- 5.Life insurance: Proceeds go to the beneficiary named in the policy. They usually reach the estate only if the estate is named or no beneficiary survives.
- 6.Retirement accounts: Individual retirement accounts (IRAs), 401(k) plans and pensions go to the beneficiary named on the plan’s beneficiary form.
- 7.Revocable trust: Property held in the trustee’s name passes under the trust terms. The will does not control it.
Why? The decedent already gave instructions for death in another document: the deed, the account contract, the policy or the trust. A will generally cannot change those instructions, unless the instrument itself allows it. For bank accounts the rule is absolute: a will cannot change a POD payee or an account survivorship right (§ 5302(e)). So a will that leaves ‘my savings account’ to a brother does not defeat a POD designation naming a daughter.
One warning for married decedents: nonprobate does not mean separate property. If community earnings paid for a life insurance policy or a POD account, the surviving spouse still has a one-half interest in it. The decedent cannot give that half to a third party without the spouse’s written consent. Section 3 explains the half-and-half rule; Chapter 8 covers the remedies.
キーポイント
Intestacy governs only the probate estate that a valid will does not dispose of (Prob. Code § 6400). It does not reach assets that pass by survivorship, beneficiary designation or trust.
例
Sorting the estate
Ana is unmarried. Her valid will leaves ‘all my property’ to her brother, Ben. Ana dies owning four assets. She holds a house in joint tenancy with her friend Cara. She has a bank account payable on death to Cara and a $100,000 life insurance policy naming her son, Dan. She also has $20,000 in a savings account in her own name.
分析
Remove the nonprobate assets first. Cara takes the house by right of survivorship and the POD account as payee. Dan takes the insurance proceeds under the policy. Only the $20,000 savings account is probate property, so only that account passes to Ben under the will.
結果
Ben takes $20,000, not ‘all’ of Ana’s property. The will controls only the probate estate.
試験のヒント
Open the distribution part of your essay by stating that nonprobate assets pass outside the will and outside intestacy. Then name each nonprobate asset, the rule that moves it, and its taker. Only then apply the will and intestacy to what is left.
試験のヒント
If community funds paid for a nonprobate asset, add one sentence: the asset passes outside probate, but the surviving spouse still has a one-half interest in it. Graders reward this crossover point.
重要なメモ
- 1.The probate estate passes under the will; any part the will does not dispose of passes by intestacy.
- 2.Nonprobate transfers take effect by contract, title or trust, and need no will formalities (Prob. Code § 5000).
- 3.Main nonprobate assets: joint tenancy, joint and POD accounts, TOD assets, life insurance, retirement accounts and revocable trusts.
- 4.A will cannot sever a joint tenancy or change a POD payee (§ 5302(e)); it generally cannot change other beneficiary designations.
- 5.Assets left outside a revocable trust are probate property, even with a pour-over will.
- 6.Nonprobate is not separate: the surviving spouse keeps a half interest in community-funded assets.
1.3 Death and marital property
Wills and Community Property are often tested together in one essay. Before you ask who takes under a will or by intestacy, ask a first question: what did the decedent own at death? A married decedent did not own everything the couple held. The surviving spouse already owned one-half of the community property. Only the decedent’s share passes by will or by intestacy.
community property – Property, other than separate property, that either spouse acquires during the marriage while domiciled in California. Each spouse owns an equal one-half interest.Cal. Fam. Code §§ 760, 751
法令CA
Cal. Prob. Code § 100
Prob. Code § 100 (paraphrase)
Paraphrase: When a married person dies, the surviving spouse owns one-half of the community property, and the decedent owns the other one-half.オープンソース
Section 100 does not create a new right. During marriage each spouse already owns a present, equal one-half interest in the community property (Fam. Code § 751). Death confirms that ownership. California divides the community item by item: the decedent owns one-half of each community asset, unless the spouses agreed in writing to a different division (§ 100(b)). Courts presume that a testator (a person who makes a will) gives away only the testator’s own half.
Exception: a will may clearly try to give away a whole community asset, including the survivor’s half. If the will also gives the survivor a benefit, the survivor must make an election (a choice). The survivor may accept the will gift and let the will control the survivor’s half. Or the survivor may keep that half and give up the will gift.
quasi-community property – Property the decedent acquired while domiciled outside California that would have been community property if the decedent had then lived in California. It covers personal property anywhere and real property in California.Cal. Prob. Code § 66
法令CA
Cal. Prob. Code § 101
Prob. Code § 101 (paraphrase)
Paraphrase: When a married person dies domiciled in California, the surviving spouse owns one-half of the decedent’s quasi-community property, and the decedent owns the other one-half.オープンソース
quasi-community property protects spouses who move to California. In most other states, each spouse owns what that spouse earns. Without § 101, the earning spouse could leave all of those earnings to someone else. Section 101 treats them like community property. Two limits apply. The decedent must die domiciled in California. And real property located in another state is not included; the law of that state governs it.
| Question | At death (Prob. Code § 66) | At divorce (Fam. Code § 125) |
|---|---|---|
| Which land counts? | At death (Prob. Code § 66)Only land in California | At divorce (Fam. Code § 125)Land anywhere |
| Whose property counts? | At death (Prob. Code § 66)Only the decedent’s property | At divorce (Fam. Code § 125)The property of either spouse |
キーポイント
Section 101 splits only the decedent’s quasi-community property. It applies when the acquiring spouse dies first. If the other spouse dies first, that spouse has no share to leave.
要素
Conditions for recapture under § 102
All three must be true:
- 1.Domicile: The decedent died domiciled in California.
- 2.Transfer: The decedent transferred the property to someone other than the spouse, for less than substantial value, without the spouse’s written consent or joinder.
- 3.Control kept: At death the decedent still had its use or income, a power to revoke, or a right of survivorship in it.
すべての要素が必要です。
The classic case is a revocable trust. A spouse earns stock in New York, moves to California, and puts the stock into a revocable trust for a sibling. At that spouse’s death, the surviving spouse may recover one-half of the stock. Exception: life insurance, accident insurance, joint annuities and pensions payable to someone other than the surviving spouse are never recaptured (§ 102(b)). Community personal property has a similar protection: under Family Code § 1100(b), a spouse may not give it away without the other spouse’s written consent.
例
The couple from Illinois
Cara and Dan married in Illinois, which is not a community property state, in 2010. Dan’s Illinois salary bought shares worth $200,000, held in his name. In 2018 they moved to San Diego. Their California salaries bought a house worth $600,000. The deed names both spouses and has no joint tenancy or survivorship words. In 2023 Cara inherited $100,000 from her mother. Dan died in 2026, domiciled in California. His valid will, signed in 2020, leaves “all my property” to his sister, Eva.
分析
The house was bought with California earnings during marriage, so it is community property. Under § 100, Cara keeps $300,000 and Dan’s half passes to Eva. The shares are quasi-community property: Dan acquired them while domiciled in Illinois. Dan was the acquiring spouse, so § 101 gives Cara $100,000 and Dan’s $100,000 passes to Eva. The inheritance is Cara’s separate property and is not in Dan’s estate.
結果
Eva takes $400,000. Cara keeps $400,000 of the couple’s property and her own $100,000.
Change one fact: Cara dies first, with a will leaving everything to her brother. Her will controls her half of the house and her $100,000 inheritance. It does not reach the Illinois shares. Dan acquired them, so they are not Cara’s quasi-community property. Dan keeps all $200,000 of the shares.
試験のヒント
Split before you distribute. First label every asset community, quasi-community or separate. Then give the surviving spouse one-half of the community property and of the decedent’s quasi-community property. Only then apply the will or the intestacy rules to the decedent’s share.
試験のヒント
For each quasi-community asset, write which spouse acquired it. If the non-acquiring spouse dies first, § 101 does not apply, and that spouse’s will cannot reach the asset. This is a common trap.
重要なメモ
- 1.Before applying a will or intestacy, label each asset community, quasi-community or separate.
- 2.§ 100: at death the survivor owns one-half of the community property; the decedent’s half passes by will or intestacy.
- 3.§ 101: the survivor owns one-half of the decedent’s quasi-community property if the decedent died domiciled in California.
- 4.§ 102: the survivor may recover one-half of quasi-community property the decedent gave away while keeping control.
- 5.Separate property is fully disposable. California has no elective share.
1.4 Survival: the 120-hour rule and simultaneous death
Intestacy gives property only to people who are alive when the decedent dies. So every distribution starts with one question: who survived? The answer is hard when two relatives die in the same accident, or when an heir dies days later. California answers with two sets of rules.
clear and convincing evidence – A standard of proof higher than a preponderance of the evidence. The evidence must show that the fact is highly probable.
120-hour rule – An heir must outlive the decedent by at least 120 hours (five days) to inherit by intestacy.Cal. Prob. Code § 6403
法令CA
Cal. Prob. Code § 6403
Prob. Code § 6403 (paraphrase)
Paraphrase: For intestate succession, the law treats a person who does not outlive the decedent by 120 hours as having died first. The same result follows if clear and convincing evidence does not show 120 hours of survival. Exception: the rule does not apply if it would cause the property to escheat to the State.オープンソース
Apply the 120-hour rule in three steps. First, measure the time between the two deaths; 120 hours is exactly five days. Second, the person who claims through the heir must prove survival by clear and convincing evidence. Third, if the proof fails, identify the heirs as if that heir had died first. The rule stops property from passing twice, first into the heir’s estate and then to the heir’s family.
例
Three days is not enough
A widowed mother dies intestate in an accident, leaving a son and a daughter. The son is in the same accident and dies 72 hours later. He leaves a wife and no children; his will leaves everything to her.
分析
72 hours is less than 120, so the law treats the son as having died first. He has no issue to take his place. The daughter is the only heir and takes the whole estate. Nothing passes into the son’s estate, so his wife takes nothing.
結果
Had the son lived six days, his estate would take one-half.
When the order of death cannot be proved
simultaneous death – Deaths where clear and convincing evidence does not show which person outlived the other. The deaths need not happen at the same moment.Cal. Prob. Code § 220
In a simultaneous death, neither estate inherits from the other. Each person’s separate property passes under that person’s own will, or to that person’s own heirs. Shared property follows the special rules below.
Exception: the beneficiary is the insured’s spouse, the policy is community or quasi-community property, and the only alternative beneficiary is the insured’s estate. Then § 103 splits the proceeds in halves, like any other community asset. So check which funds paid the premiums.
| Asset | Rule | Where it goes | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community and quasi-community property | RuleSplit in halves | Where it goesOne half through each spouse’s estate | AuthorityProb. Code § 103 |
| Joint tenancy | RuleSplit in halves; no survivorship | Where it goesOne half through each joint tenant’s estate | AuthorityProb. Code § 223 |
| Life insurance | RuleInsured treated as the survivor | Where it goesContingent beneficiary or the insured’s estate. Community policy with only the estate as alternative: halves | AuthorityProb. Code § 224 |
| Separate property | RuleOwner treated as the survivor | Where it goesThe owner’s own beneficiaries or heirs | AuthorityProb. Code § 6403 in intestacy; § 220 for other transfers |
例
Spouses who die in the same accident
Ana and Ben, spouses domiciled in California, die in the same accident. No evidence shows who died first. Neither has a will. Each has one adult child from an earlier marriage: Ana’s is Cara and Ben’s is Dan. The spouses own a house as joint tenants and a $200,000 community account. Ben also owns inherited shares worth $80,000.
分析
No evidence proves that either spouse survived the other by 120 hours, so neither is the other’s heir (§ 6403). Section 223 splits the house in halves, one half through each estate. Section 103 splits the account the same way. The shares are Ben’s separate property. Ana is not his heir, so the shares pass to his only child, Dan (§ 6402(a)).
結果
Cara takes one-half of the house and $100,000. Dan takes one-half of the house, $100,000 and the shares.
キーポイント
The 120-hour rule removes an heir. It never takes away a surviving spouse’s own half of the community property, because that half belonged to the spouse all along (§ 100).
試験のヒント
State the standard first: the claimant must prove survival by clear and convincing evidence. Then give each asset its own sentence: community property, joint tenancy, insurance, separate property. Each asset rule earns a point.
試験のヒント
State that California has no age-based survivorship presumption before you split the asset. Then test the evidence in the facts, such as an unsure witness, against the clear and convincing standard.
重要なメモ
- 1.An heir must outlive the decedent by 120 hours, proved by clear and convincing evidence, or is treated as predeceased (§ 6403).
- 2.The 120-hour rule does not apply if it would cause escheat to the State.
- 3.If survival cannot be proved, each person’s own property passes as if that person survived (§ 220).
- 4.Community property and joint tenancy are split in halves; insurance passes as if the insured survived (§§ 103, 223, 224).
- 5.A document that deals with simultaneous death or sets a survival period controls (§ 221).
- 6.Will beneficiaries need only survive, shown by clear and convincing evidence (§§ 21109, 222).
1.5 The surviving spouse’s share
After you split the marital property in half (section 3) and confirm who survived (section 4), compute the heirs’ shares. The surviving spouse comes first. Probate Code § 6401 fixes the spouse’s share, and § 6402 sends the rest to other relatives (section 6). The share covers only property that no valid will disposes of. It depends on the character of the property and the family left behind.
法令CA
Cal. Prob. Code § 6401
Prob. Code § 6401 (paraphrase)
Paraphrase: Under subdivision (a), the surviving spouse takes the decedent’s one-half of the community property under § 100. Under subdivision (b), the spouse takes the decedent’s one-half of the quasi-community property under § 101. Under subdivision (c), the spouse takes all, one-half or one-third of the separate property, depending on which relatives survive.オープンソース
Community property and the decedent’s quasi-community property are simple. The surviving spouse already owns one-half under §§ 100 and 101. That half is not part of the decedent’s estate at all. Section 6401 then gives the spouse the decedent’s half as well. In intestacy, therefore, the surviving spouse ends with all of this property. Children, parents and siblings take none of it.
要素
The separate property share under § 6401(c)
Check who survives the decedent, in this order. Stop at the first line that fits.
- 1.One-third: Two or more child lines survive. A child line is a living child, or a deceased child who left surviving issue.
- 2.One-half: Exactly one child line survives: one child, or the issue of one deceased child.
- 3.One-half: No issue survive, but a parent survives, or a brother, sister, niece, nephew or other issue of a parent.
- 4.All: No issue, no parent and no brother or sister (or their issue) survive.
Separate property is where the family matters. Count child lines, not grandchildren. A child who survives is one line. A child who died before the decedent but left surviving issue is also one line. A child who died with no issue is not a line at all. One line gives the spouse one-half. Two or more lines give the spouse one-third.
If no issue survive, look up the family tree. A surviving parent cuts the spouse’s share to one-half. So does a brother, a sister, or any issue of a brother or sister. Relatives further out do not count. Grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins never reduce the spouse’s share. A spouse who survives with only a grandmother takes all the separate property.
| Who else survives the decedent | Spouse’s share of community and quasi-community property | Spouse’s share of separate property | The rest of the separate property goes to |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two or more child lines | Spouse’s share of community and quasi-community propertyAll | Spouse’s share of separate propertyOne-third | The rest of the separate property goes toThe issue (§ 6402(a)), shared under § 240 |
| Exactly one child line | Spouse’s share of community and quasi-community propertyAll | Spouse’s share of separate propertyOne-half | The rest of the separate property goes toThat child, or the issue of that deceased child (§ 6402(a)) |
| No issue; one or both parents | Spouse’s share of community and quasi-community propertyAll | Spouse’s share of separate propertyOne-half | The rest of the separate property goes toThe parent or parents equally (§ 6402(b)) |
| No issue or parent; a brother, sister or their issue | Spouse’s share of community and quasi-community propertyAll | Spouse’s share of separate propertyOne-half | The rest of the separate property goes toThe issue of the parents (§ 6402(c)) |
| None of the above (for example, only a grandparent or a cousin) | Spouse’s share of community and quasi-community propertyAll | Spouse’s share of separate propertyAll | The rest of the separate property goes toNobody else |
A couple who lived together for years but never married or registered are unmarried cohabitants. The survivor is not an heir and takes nothing in intestacy. The survivor may still have a contract claim against the estate (Community Property chapter 1).
例
Computing the spouse’s share
Ana dies without a will. She leaves her husband, Ben, and two children, Cara and Dan. A third child, Eli, died years earlier with no children. Ana’s mother also survives. Ana and Ben own a house worth $900,000, bought with earnings during the marriage. Ana also owns $600,000 in savings that she inherited from her father.
分析
The house is community property. Ben already owns one-half ($450,000) under § 100 and inherits Ana’s half ($450,000) under § 6401(a). The savings are separate property. Cara and Dan are two child lines. Eli is not a line, because he left no issue. Ben therefore takes one-third of the savings ($200,000). Ana’s mother takes nothing, because issue survive.
結果
Ben ends with the whole house ($900,000) and $200,000 of the savings. Cara and Dan share the other $400,000 equally, so each takes $200,000.
例
Variation: no children
Same facts, but Ana never had children. Her mother has died. Her sister, Fay, and her grandfather survive.
分析
Ben still ends with the whole house. For the savings, no issue or parent survives, but Fay is issue of Ana’s parents. Ben takes one-half ($300,000) and Fay takes the other half (§ 6402(c)). The grandfather takes nothing.
試験のヒント
Show the arithmetic in three steps. First, split community and quasi-community property in half (§§ 100 to 101). Second, give the decedent’s half to the spouse (§ 6401). Third, apply the separate property tier and name who takes the rest (§ 6402).
試験のヒント
Name the tier and the relatives that trigger it. If no issue survive, say whether a parent or the sibling line survives; grandparents never reduce the share. For example: ‘Two child lines survive, so the spouse takes one-third of the separate property (§ 6401(c)).’
重要なメモ
- 1.In intestacy the spouse takes the decedent’s half of community and quasi-community property, so the spouse ends with all of it.
- 2.Separate property: one-third if two or more child lines survive; one-half if exactly one child line survives.
- 3.No issue: one-half if a parent or the sibling line survives; otherwise the spouse takes all the separate property.
- 4.Grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins never reduce the spouse’s share.
- 5.Registered domestic partners take a spouse’s share (Fam. Code § 297.5); putative spouses inherit too; unmarried cohabitants do not.
- 6.A divorced spouse is not a surviving spouse; a spouse in a pending divorce still is, unless an order ended property rights (§ 78).
1.6 Other heirs and how shares are divided
Section 5 covered the surviving spouse. Probate Code § 6402 sends everything else to relatives in a fixed order. Find the first class with a living member, then divide within that class.
法令CA
Cal. Prob. Code § 6402
Prob. Code § 6402 (paraphrase)
Paraphrase: Whatever the surviving spouse does not take passes to the first class in the list below that has a living member. In the issue classes, relatives of the same generation share equally, and relatives of different generations share under § 240. For next of kin, those who claim through the nearest ancestor come first (§ 6402(f)).オープンソース
要素
The order of heirs (§ 6402)
Stop at the first class with a living member.
- 1.First: Issue: children, grandchildren and more remote descendants.
- 2.Second: Parents, equally.
- 3.Third: Issue of the parents: brothers, sisters and their descendants.
- 4.Fourth: Grandparents; if none survives, their issue, such as aunts, uncles and cousins.
- 5.Fifth: Issue of a predeceased spouse (one who died while married to the decedent), such as stepchildren.
- 6.Sixth: Next of kin, the closest in degree.
- 7.Seventh: Parents of a predeceased spouse, or their issue.
- 8.Last: Escheat: the estate passes to the State of California (§ 6404).
どれでも十分です。
A closer class excludes every later class: one living grandchild cuts out the parents and siblings. The fifth and seventh classes reach a predeceased spouse’s family, so a stepchild who was never adopted can inherit if no one closer survives. Also watch § 6402.5. If the decedent leaves no spouse or issue, property that came from a predeceased spouse can pass to that spouse’s family. The limit is 15 years after that spouse’s death for real property and 5 years for personal property.
representation – The rule that the living issue of a dead relative take, together, the share that relative would have taken.Cal. Prob. Code § 240
When heirs are of different generations, such as a living child and a dead child’s children, the dead child’s children take by representation. California has three methods for this. Two carry Latin names: per stirpes (by family line) and per capita (by head).
| Question | § 240 (intestacy) | § 246 (strict per stirpes) | § 247 (per capita at each generation) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where is the first division? | § 240 (intestacy)Nearest generation with a living member | § 246 (strict per stirpes)Always at the children, even if all are dead | § 247 (per capita at each generation)Nearest generation with a living member |
| Where does a dead member’s share go? | § 240 (intestacy)Down that member’s own line | § 246 (strict per stirpes)Down that member’s own line | § 247 (per capita at each generation)All dead members’ shares are pooled and split equally at the next generation |
例
One family tree, three answers
Dana dies intestate and unmarried, leaving $1,200,000. Her children, A and B, died before her. A left one child, A-1. B left three children: B-1, who is alive, and B-2 and B-3, who also died before Dana. B-2 left one child, B-2-1. B-3 left two, B-3-1 and B-3-2.
分析
Sections 240 and 247 divide at the grandchildren: four shares, for A-1, B-1, B-2 and B-3. Section 246 divides at the children: one-half per line. Section 247 then pools the B-2 and B-3 shares for their three children.
| Heir | § 240 | § 246 | § 247 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-1 | § 240$300,000 (1/4) | § 246$600,000 (1/2) | § 247$300,000 (1/4) |
| B-1 | § 240$300,000 (1/4) | § 246$200,000 (1/6) | § 247$300,000 (1/4) |
| B-2-1 | § 240$300,000 (1/4) | § 246$200,000 (1/6) | § 247$200,000 (1/6) |
| B-3-1 | § 240$150,000 (1/8) | § 246$100,000 (1/12) | § 247$200,000 (1/6) |
| B-3-2 | § 240$150,000 (1/8) | § 246$100,000 (1/12) | § 247$200,000 (1/6) |
試験のヒント
Intestacy always uses § 240. A common wrong answer divides at the children when all of them are dead. That is § 246, which applies only when a will or trust chooses it.
Who counts as a relative
要素
When an adopted child still inherits from a birth parent
- 1.They lived together as parent and child, or the parent, married to or living with the other parent at conception, died before birth.
- 2.The adoption was by a birth parent’s spouse (a stepparent adoption) or after a birth parent’s death.
すべての要素が必要です。
Example: Ana lived with her father until he died. Her mother then married Ben, who adopted Ana. Ana can still inherit from her father’s parents. But her father’s relatives usually cannot inherit from Ana (§ 6451(b)).
A stepparent who could have adopted but chose not to does not qualify. The legal barrier must last until the stepparent’s death (Estate of Joseph (1998) 17 Cal.4th 203). A birth parent’s refusal to consent ends when the child becomes an adult, because an adult can be adopted without it. So § 6454 usually helps only a child who was still a minor when the stepparent died. If § 6454 is met, the child’s issue can inherit too. The court-made doctrine of equitable adoption also survives (§ 6455).
Advancements
advancement – A lifetime gift to an heir that counts against that heir’s intestate share.Cal. Prob. Code § 6409
Value an advancement when the heir received it or at death, whichever came first. Exception: a stated value controls if it appears in the decedent’s writing made at the time of the gift, or in the heir’s acknowledgment made at that time. If the heir dies before the decedent, the gift does not count against the heir’s issue unless the writing says so.
例
Adding the advancement back
Lee dies intestate and unmarried, leaving $300,000 and two children, Max and Nora. Years earlier, Lee gave Max $60,000 with a signed note, made that day, calling it an advancement against his share.
分析
Add the gift back: $360,000, so each share is $180,000. Max already has $60,000, so he takes $120,000 more. Nora takes $180,000.
結果
Without the note, each child takes $150,000.
重要なメモ
- 1.Heirs take in the § 6402 order; the first class with a living member excludes every later class.
- 2.With no heir, the estate escheats to the State of California (§ 6404).
- 3.Intestacy divides at the first generation with a living member (§ 240); “per stirpes” in a will means § 246.
- 4.Half-bloods take equally (§ 6406); adopted children inherit like children by birth (§§ 6450, 6451).
- 5.Stepchildren inherit only under § 6454; advancements need a writing (§ 6409).
1.7 Review
This review tests the five skills of the chapter. You must separate probate from nonprobate property and split marital property at death. You must also apply the survival rules, compute the surviving spouse’s share and divide the rest among the other heirs. Items 1.1 to 1.4 are California multiple-choice questions. Item 1.5 is a 15-minute essay drill. Answer each item in writing before you open the explanation.
| Step (in order) | What to do | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Remove nonprobate assets | What to doTake out joint tenancy property, payable-on-death accounts, life insurance and trust assets. Intestacy reaches only what is left. | AuthoritySection 2 of this chapter |
| Test survival | What to doEach heir must survive by 120 hours, shown by clear and convincing evidence. If the order of deaths cannot be proved, split the property. | AuthorityProb. Code §§ 6403, 220–224 |
| Classify each asset | What to doLabel it community, quasi-community or separate property. Look at when and how it was acquired, not only at whose name is on the title. | AuthorityFam. Code §§ 760, 770; Prob. Code § 66 |
| Split marital property | What to doOne-half of community and quasi-community property already belongs to the surviving spouse. Only the decedent’s half enters the estate. | AuthorityProb. Code §§ 100–101 |
| Give the spouse’s share | What to doThe decedent’s half of community and quasi-community property, plus all, one-half or one-third of the separate property. | AuthorityProb. Code § 6401 |
| Pass the rest | What to doIssue first, then parents, then issue of parents, then more remote relatives. Divide among descendants at the first generation with a living member. | AuthorityProb. Code §§ 6402, 240 |
| The decedent also leaves | Spouse’s share | The rest goes to |
|---|---|---|
| No issue, no parent, no sibling and no issue of a sibling | Spouse’s shareAll | The rest goes toNobody; the spouse takes everything |
| Only one child, or the issue of one deceased child | Spouse’s shareOne-half | The rest goes toThat child, or that child’s issue |
| No issue, but a parent or the issue of a parent | Spouse’s shareOne-half | The rest goes toThe parents; if none, the issue of the parents |
| More than one child; one child plus issue of a deceased child; or issue of two or more deceased children | Spouse’s shareOne-third | The rest goes toThe issue (§ 6402(a)), shared under § 240 |
How to use the essay drill. Set a timer for 15 minutes and write one heading per asset. Follow the attack order above and show every number. The drill uses only personal property and California land. Under Prob. Code § 66, quasi-community property covers personal property wherever it is located, but land only if it is in California. If a fact pattern includes land in another state, flag it: the law of that state governs it.
試験のヒント
Before you apply intestacy, write one sentence per asset that splits community and quasi-community property in half. Then state the spouse’s share and each heir’s share in dollars. Graders look for the split and the numbers.
キーポイント
Answer each question in one sentence of your own before you read the options. The essay asks you to recall the rule, not to recognize it.
練習 · MBE
Shift + 文字でオプションを選択します
正解:C
練習 · MBE
Shift + 文字でオプションを選択します
正解:A
練習 · MBE
Shift + 文字でオプションを選択します
正解:B
練習 · MBE
Shift + 文字でオプションを選択します
正解:D
練習 · MBE
Shift + 文字でオプションを選択します
正解:B
– Co-ownership with a right of survivorship: when one joint tenant dies, the others own the whole property outside probate.
– Division among descendants that always starts at the children’s generation. California uses it only when a will or trust calls for it (§ 246).
– The passing of property to the State when no will disposes of it and no heir, including a predeceased spouse’s family, can take (§ 6404).
– The court-supervised process that collects a decedent’s probate estate, pays the debts and distributes the rest under the will or by intestacy.
– A person who takes property under a will, trust, insurance policy or account designation. A person who takes by intestacy is an heir.
– A person who makes a will. The will can dispose only of the testator’s own property.
– A bank account that passes at the owner’s death directly to a named payee, outside the will and outside probate.
– A person who believed in good faith that a void or voidable marriage was valid. In intestacy, a putative spouse takes as a surviving spouse.
– A relative connected through only one common parent, such as a half-brother. In California, half-bloods inherit the same share as whole-blood relatives (§ 6406).
重要なメモ
Chapter summary
- 1.Intestacy reaches only the probate estate. Joint tenancy, payable-on-death accounts, life insurance and trust assets pass outside it.
- 2.At death, one-half of community and quasi-community property already belongs to the surviving spouse (§§ 100–101). The decedent controls only the other half.
- 3.The spouse inherits the decedent’s half of community and quasi-community property, plus all, one-half or one-third of separate property (§ 6401).
- 4.An heir must survive by 120 hours, shown by clear and convincing evidence (§ 6403). Without that proof, the heir is treated as predeceased.
- 5.Simultaneous death: if survival cannot be proved, each person’s property passes as if that person survived; joint tenancy splits in half (§§ 220, 223).
- 6.The rest passes in the § 6402 order. Descendants share at the first generation with a living member (§ 240); the State takes last.
この章の権威者
1章の終わり
読んだ内容について答えを書きます。
遺言・相続法 に関する時間制限付きのエッセイ。カリフォルニアのルーブリックに基づいて採点されます。