2027년 2월 · 2027년 7월 · 2028년 2월에 적용 · 2028년 7월에서 NextGen

PRCA시험의 98% 에세이

법조윤리

Professional Responsibility

ABA 모범규칙과 캘리포니아 직업행위규칙: 이해충돌, 비밀유지, 보수, 직무능력, 진실의무. 캘리포니아 에세이 시험일에 거의 매번 출제.

1챕터1시간의 독서15 연습 문제


장

  1. 1Sources, Discipline and Forming the RelationshipThe foundation of Professional Responsibility for the California essay: the ABA Model Rules, the California Rules of Professional Conduct and the State Bar Act; how the State Bar disciplines lawyers and how discipline differs from malpractice; when a lawyer-client relationship forms and what a lawyer owes a prospective client; who decides what in a representation, limited-scope work and advice about illegal conduct, including California’s cannabis comment; the statutory duties in B&P § 6068, including the 30-day self-report; and the ABA-then-California method for every PR essay.무료

캘리포니아의 차이점

1장에서

CA캘리포니아 차이점

Prospective clients: ABA versus California

일반 규칙(연방/다수)

MR 1.18(c) disqualifies the lawyer only if the information could be significantly harmful to the prospective client. Both persons must give informed consent, confirmed in writing.

캘리포니아

CRPC 1.18(c) disqualifies the lawyer if the information is confidential under B&P § 6068(e) and rule 1.6 and is material to the matter. Both persons must give informed written consent.

“Material” is a lower bar than “significantly harmful”, so California disqualifies more often. Apply both tests.

CA캘리포니아 차이점

Illegal conduct and the cannabis comment

일반 규칙(연방/다수)

MR 1.2(d) bars counseling or assisting conduct the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. It has no special provision for a conflict between state and federal law.

캘리포니아

CRPC 1.2.1 also bars conduct the lawyer knows violates any law, rule or ruling of a tribunal. Its comment addresses California law that conflicts with federal law, such as state-licensed cannabis. The lawyer may advise on and help with compliance, but must also explain the federal law.

For a cannabis client, write: permitted under CRPC 1.2.1 and its comment, if the lawyer advises about federal law. Under MR 1.2(d) alone, note the risk: the conduct is a federal crime, and the ABA text has no exception.

CA캘리포니아 차이점

Exceptions to confidentiality

일반 규칙(연방/다수)

MR 1.6(b) lists several permissive exceptions. The lawyer may disclose to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm. The lawyer may also disclose to prevent or remedy some client crimes or frauds that use the lawyer’s services, to get ethics advice, or for self-defense.

캘리포니아

Apart from client consent, B&P § 6068(e)(2) and CRPC 1.6(b) allow disclosure only to prevent a criminal act likely to cause death or substantial bodily harm. Before disclosing, if reasonable, the lawyer must try to dissuade the client and tell the client of the decision to disclose (CRPC 1.6(c)).

California has no financial-fraud exception. If a client’s fraud will cost a victim money, the ABA lawyer may sometimes disclose; the California lawyer may not. Chapter 3 covers the details.


강의

Robert Castellano

법조윤리 강사

Former State Bar ethics counsel; discipline-defense practice; legal-ethics adjunct.

우리 강사는 AI 음성 교육 페르소나입니다. 초상화는 삽화입니다.

법조윤리의 동영상 강의를 녹화하고 있습니다.


13개 과목 전체, 월 $249부터

무제한 MBE 및 캘리포니아 문제, 시간 제한 세트 및 모의, AI 에세이 피드백, 게시되는 모든 장 및 시험 날짜에 맞춰 작성된 학습 계획.

요금제 보기