Profesionálna zodpovednosť

Professional Responsibility

Modelové pravidlá ABA a Kalifornské pravidlá profesionálneho správania: konflikty, dôvernosť, poplatky, kompetencia a úprimnosť. Testované takmer každý kalifornský esejový deň.

Kapitola 11 hodina čítania15 cvičných otázok

Prečítajte si kapitolu 1 zadarmo Cvičte eseje

kapitoly

1Sources, Discipline and Forming the RelationshipThe foundation of Professional Responsibility for the California essay: the ABA Model Rules, the California Rules of Professional Conduct and the State Bar Act; how the State Bar disciplines lawyers and how discipline differs from malpractice; when a lawyer-client relationship forms and what a lawyer owes a prospective client; who decides what in a representation, limited-scope work and advice about illegal conduct, including California’s cannabis comment; the statutory duties in B&P § 6068, including the 30-day self-report; and the ABA-then-California method for every PR essay.56 minZadarmo

Ako sa Kalifornia líši

Z kapitoly 1

CAKalifornský rozdiel

Prospective clients: ABA versus California

Všeobecné pravidlo (federálne/väčšinové)

MR 1.18(c) disqualifies the lawyer only if the information could be significantly harmful to the prospective client. Both persons must give informed consent, confirmed in writing.

Kalifornia

CRPC 1.18(c) disqualifies the lawyer if the information is confidential under B&P § 6068(e) and rule 1.6 and is material to the matter. Both persons must give informed written consent.

“Material” is a lower bar than “significantly harmful”, so California disqualifies more often. Apply both tests.

CAKalifornský rozdiel

Illegal conduct and the cannabis comment

Všeobecné pravidlo (federálne/väčšinové)

MR 1.2(d) bars counseling or assisting conduct the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. It has no special provision for a conflict between state and federal law.

Kalifornia

CRPC 1.2.1 also bars conduct the lawyer knows violates any law, rule or ruling of a tribunal. Its comment addresses California law that conflicts with federal law, such as state-licensed cannabis. The lawyer may advise on and help with compliance, but must also explain the federal law.

For a cannabis client, write: permitted under CRPC 1.2.1 and its comment, if the lawyer advises about federal law. Under MR 1.2(d) alone, note the risk: the conduct is a federal crime, and the ABA text has no exception.

CAKalifornský rozdiel

Exceptions to confidentiality

Všeobecné pravidlo (federálne/väčšinové)

MR 1.6(b) lists several permissive exceptions. The lawyer may disclose to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm. The lawyer may also disclose to prevent or remedy some client crimes or frauds that use the lawyer’s services, to get ethics advice, or for self-defense.

Kalifornia

Apart from client consent, B&P § 6068(e)(2) and CRPC 1.6(b) allow disclosure only to prevent a criminal act likely to cause death or substantial bodily harm. Before disclosing, if reasonable, the lawyer must try to dissuade the client and tell the client of the decision to disclose (CRPC 1.6(c)).

California has no financial-fraud exception. If a client’s fraud will cost a victim money, the ABA lawyer may sometimes disclose; the California lawyer may not. Chapter 3 covers the details.

Lekcie

Robert Castellano

Profesionálna zodpovednosť lektor

Former State Bar ethics counsel; discipline-defense practice; legal-ethics adjunct.

Naši lektori sú učiteľské osobnosti s hlasom AI; portréty sú ilustrácie.

Video lekcie pre Profesionálna zodpovednosť sa nahrávajú.

Všetkých 13 subjektov od 249 $ mesačne

Neobmedzené MBE a Kalifornské otázky, načasované sady a simulácie, spätná väzba na umelú esej, každá kapitola tak, ako je publikovaná, a študijný plán zostavený podľa dátumu skúšky.

Pozrite si plány