Câu hỏi MBE, giải thích từng tùy chọn.

Real Property

1. AYes, because she used the strip openly and continuously for longer than the 10-year statutory period.
2. BYes, because the neighbor's statement created a license that became irrevocable after 15 years of reliance.
3. CNo, because her use began with the neighbor's permission and never became adverse.Chính xác
4. DNo, because a prescriptive easement cannot bind a buyer of the servient land who did not know of the use.

Tại sao mỗi lựa chọn

A

This option checks the period but ignores the adversity element. Open and continuous use for the statutory period creates an easement only if the use was also without permission. Permissive use never ripens into a prescriptive right.

B

This option assumes time alone makes a license irrevocable. A license becomes irrevocable only when the licensee spends money or labor in reasonable reliance on it. The homeowner made no such investment.

C

Correct. Prescription requires adverse use. The neighbor's express permission made the use permissive from the start, so it never became adverse. The homeowner held only a license, which ended when the neighbor sold his land.

D

This option misstates the effect of prescription. A prescriptive easement, once acquired, binds later owners of the servient land regardless of notice. The homeowner loses because she never acquired one, not because of the buyer's knowledge.